<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stogie Tip: Sixty is the New Fifty-Four</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/07/stogie-commentary-sixty-is-new-fifty.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/07/stogie-commentary-sixty-is-new-fifty.html</link>
	<description>Blowin’  Smoke on Everything Cigars - cigar reviews, news and commentary 7 days a week</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:25:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stogie Reviews: Cubao No. 3 (Lancero)</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/07/stogie-commentary-sixty-is-new-fifty.html/comment-page-1#comment-77424</link>
		<dc:creator>Stogie Reviews: Cubao No. 3 (Lancero)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 07:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stogieguys.com/?p=63#comment-77424</guid>
		<description>[...] some shy away from the trend for bigger and bigger ring gauges, recently the lancero seems to have made a resurgence. A perfect example of this is the Cubao No. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] some shy away from the trend for bigger and bigger ring gauges, recently the lancero seems to have made a resurgence. A perfect example of this is the Cubao No. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/07/stogie-commentary-sixty-is-new-fifty.html/comment-page-1#comment-37094</link>
		<dc:creator>D Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stogieguys.com/?p=63#comment-37094</guid>
		<description>96 ring seems a bit on the extreme size, but my favorite cigar (at the moment) is the La Flor Dominicana Ligero L-500 Cabinet, which is 60 ring by 5-3/4. It is a powerful, incredibly flavorful smoke with hints of dark chocolate. I&#039;ve had several other sizes in the Ligero line and, while still good, none was nearly as pleasurable as the L-500. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>96 ring seems a bit on the extreme size, but my favorite cigar (at the moment) is the La Flor Dominicana Ligero L-500 Cabinet, which is 60 ring by 5-3/4. It is a powerful, incredibly flavorful smoke with hints of dark chocolate. I&#039;ve had several other sizes in the Ligero line and, while still good, none was nearly as pleasurable as the L-500.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stogie Reviews: Padilla Miami 8 &#38; 11 Lancero</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/07/stogie-commentary-sixty-is-new-fifty.html/comment-page-1#comment-37050</link>
		<dc:creator>Stogie Reviews: Padilla Miami 8 &#38; 11 Lancero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stogieguys.com/?p=63#comment-37050</guid>
		<description>[...] a staple of their new lines, perhaps sensing a backlash by some cigar connoisseurs against the ever widening ring gauges that the cigar industry has been [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a staple of their new lines, perhaps sensing a backlash by some cigar connoisseurs against the ever widening ring gauges that the cigar industry has been [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergios</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/07/stogie-commentary-sixty-is-new-fifty.html/comment-page-1#comment-7463</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 08:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stogieguys.com/?p=63#comment-7463</guid>
		<description>Sorry :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry <img src='http://www.stogieguys.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Savvas</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/07/stogie-commentary-sixty-is-new-fifty.html/comment-page-1#comment-6694</link>
		<dc:creator>Savvas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 18:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stogieguys.com/?p=63#comment-6694</guid>
		<description>Nice... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthaios</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/07/stogie-commentary-sixty-is-new-fifty.html/comment-page-1#comment-6437</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthaios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 22:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stogieguys.com/?p=63#comment-6437</guid>
		<description>Nice... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vasilis</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/07/stogie-commentary-sixty-is-new-fifty.html/comment-page-1#comment-6300</link>
		<dc:creator>Vasilis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stogieguys.com/?p=63#comment-6300</guid>
		<description>Cool! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Stogie Guys &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stogie Guys Friday Sampler VIII (Labor Day Edition)</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/07/stogie-commentary-sixty-is-new-fifty.html/comment-page-1#comment-603</link>
		<dc:creator>The Stogie Guys &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stogie Guys Friday Sampler VIII (Labor Day Edition)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 16:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stogieguys.com/?p=63#comment-603</guid>
		<description>[...] 2) And while we&#8217;re on the topic of those dead-tree cigar publications, we&#8217;re glad to see that Smoke Magazine is covering the emerging trend of large ring gauge cigars by reviewing 26 stogies with ring gauges 50 and over, including six that are at least 60. Of course, we should point out that a while back we asked if sixty is the new fifty-four. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2) And while we&#8217;re on the topic of those dead-tree cigar publications, we&#8217;re glad to see that Smoke Magazine is covering the emerging trend of large ring gauge cigars by reviewing 26 stogies with ring gauges 50 and over, including six that are at least 60. Of course, we should point out that a while back we asked if sixty is the new fifty-four. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Stogie Guys &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stogie Reviews: Punch After Dinner EMS</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/07/stogie-commentary-sixty-is-new-fifty.html/comment-page-1#comment-522</link>
		<dc:creator>The Stogie Guys &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stogie Reviews: Punch After Dinner EMS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 19:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stogieguys.com/?p=63#comment-522</guid>
		<description>[...] Overall, like most Punch cigars, this one’s a keeper. The thin body is a refreshing contrast to the 52 ring gauged behemoths that dominate the American market, the change in flavors is interesting and unique, and – at about $4.50 apiece retail – it’s a steal. I give the Punch After Dinner EMS a solid four out of five stogies. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Overall, like most Punch cigars, this one’s a keeper. The thin body is a refreshing contrast to the 52 ring gauged behemoths that dominate the American market, the change in flavors is interesting and unique, and – at about $4.50 apiece retail – it’s a steal. I give the Punch After Dinner EMS a solid four out of five stogies. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/07/stogie-commentary-sixty-is-new-fifty.html/comment-page-1#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stogieguys.com/?p=63#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Is that really a Pogs reference? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that really a Pogs reference?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

