<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stogie Reviews: Arturo Fuente Privada No. 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/07/stogie-reviews-arturo-fuente-privada.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/07/stogie-reviews-arturo-fuente-privada.html</link>
	<description>Blowin’  Smoke on Everything Cigars - cigar reviews, news and commentary 7 days a week</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:25:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: markh</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/07/stogie-reviews-arturo-fuente-privada.html/comment-page-1#comment-1801</link>
		<dc:creator>markh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stogieguys.com/?p=51#comment-1801</guid>
		<description>how is this cigar&#039;s pull? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how is this cigar&#039;s pull?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Stogie Guys &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stogie Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/07/stogie-reviews-arturo-fuente-privada.html/comment-page-1#comment-672</link>
		<dc:creator>The Stogie Guys &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stogie Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 22:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stogieguys.com/?p=51#comment-672</guid>
		<description>[...] Arturo Fuente Privada No. 1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Arturo Fuente Privada No. 1 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Stogie Guys &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stogie Exclusive: Clearing the Air About Cigar Night</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/07/stogie-reviews-arturo-fuente-privada.html/comment-page-1#comment-596</link>
		<dc:creator>The Stogie Guys &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stogie Exclusive: Clearing the Air About Cigar Night</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 16:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stogieguys.com/?p=51#comment-596</guid>
		<description>[...] An anonymous comment was left on Friday’s post regarding our proposal to the Washington Nationals to create a temporary cigar section at RFK Stadium for an upcoming home game. As you know, the Nats rebuffed our suggestion. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An anonymous comment was left on Friday’s post regarding our proposal to the Washington Nationals to create a temporary cigar section at RFK Stadium for an upcoming home game. As you know, the Nats rebuffed our suggestion. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/07/stogie-reviews-arturo-fuente-privada.html/comment-page-1#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 08:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stogieguys.com/?p=51#comment-62</guid>
		<description>The above comment is the biggest bunch of BS I ever read.

UVA Law School must really suck if you actually even attended!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The above comment is the biggest bunch of BS I ever read.</p>
<p>UVA Law School must really suck if you actually even attended!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/07/stogie-reviews-arturo-fuente-privada.html/comment-page-1#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 00:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stogieguys.com/?p=51#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Not only has it been proven unprofitable for private establishments to allow smoking because of the negative impact it has on non-smokers, but it is also illegal for RFK Stadium to have a cigar smoking facility in the stadium.  In my expert legal opinion (UVA Law School &#039;04) RFK would not be exempt from the Washington, DC smoking ban.  Because it would be run by Aramark, the stadium&#039;s operator, and it would be run inside the stadium it would be counted as part of the profit of the stadium.  This means it would not meet the required income from tobacco products to be exempt under DC&#039;s smoking ban.  Sorry to rain on your parade. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only has it been proven unprofitable for private establishments to allow smoking because of the negative impact it has on non-smokers, but it is also illegal for RFK Stadium to have a cigar smoking facility in the stadium.  In my expert legal opinion (UVA Law School &#039;04) RFK would not be exempt from the Washington, DC smoking ban.  Because it would be run by Aramark, the stadium&#039;s operator, and it would be run inside the stadium it would be counted as part of the profit of the stadium.  This means it would not meet the required income from tobacco products to be exempt under DC&#039;s smoking ban.  Sorry to rain on your parade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

