<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stogie Reviews: Butera Royal Vintage Mira Bella</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/09/stogie-reviews-butera-royal-vintage.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/09/stogie-reviews-butera-royal-vintage.html</link>
	<description>Blowin’  Smoke on Everything Cigars - cigar reviews, news and commentary 7 days a week</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:44:58 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff J</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/09/stogie-reviews-butera-royal-vintage.html/comment-page-1#comment-10062</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 13:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/09/stogie-reviews-butera-royal-vintage.html#comment-10062</guid>
		<description>Agree with review; Very smooth and mild-- construction was an issue as I experienced an uneven burn and the cigar would go out randomly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with review; Very smooth and mild&#8211; construction was an issue as I experienced an uneven burn and the cigar would go out randomly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KegWorks Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The 19th Hole Just Got Better!</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/09/stogie-reviews-butera-royal-vintage.html/comment-page-1#comment-8709</link>
		<dc:creator>KegWorks Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The 19th Hole Just Got Better!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 12:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/09/stogie-reviews-butera-royal-vintage.html#comment-8709</guid>
		<description>[...] The smoke you want is the Butera Royal Vintage. While hard to find, it is worth the hunt; Should you find them, I suggest you buy a handful and keep them in your humidor. This smoke is made in the Dominican Republic with Indonesian and Dominican tobacco, and wrapped with a beautiful Connecticut Shade Wrapper. By the looks of this cigar you wouldn’t think there was much to it, however don’t be fooled by the appearance. It pairs perfectly with an ice cold Stella. Does not overpower, but instead, enhanced the citrus undertones of the beer. The Butera Royal Vintage, although mild, has a creamy, sweet taste that makes it impossible to put down. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The smoke you want is the Butera Royal Vintage. While hard to find, it is worth the hunt; Should you find them, I suggest you buy a handful and keep them in your humidor. This smoke is made in the Dominican Republic with Indonesian and Dominican tobacco, and wrapped with a beautiful Connecticut Shade Wrapper. By the looks of this cigar you wouldn’t think there was much to it, however don’t be fooled by the appearance. It pairs perfectly with an ice cold Stella. Does not overpower, but instead, enhanced the citrus undertones of the beer. The Butera Royal Vintage, although mild, has a creamy, sweet taste that makes it impossible to put down. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Stogie Guys &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stogie Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/09/stogie-reviews-butera-royal-vintage.html/comment-page-1#comment-2607</link>
		<dc:creator>The Stogie Guys &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stogie Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/09/stogie-reviews-butera-royal-vintage.html#comment-2607</guid>
		<description>[...] Butera Royal Vintage Mira Bella CAO Brazilia Gol [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Butera Royal Vintage Mira Bella CAO Brazilia Gol [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Stogie Guys &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stogie Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/09/stogie-reviews-butera-royal-vintage.html/comment-page-1#comment-774</link>
		<dc:creator>The Stogie Guys &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stogie Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 17:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/09/stogie-reviews-butera-royal-vintage.html#comment-774</guid>
		<description>[...] Butera Royal Vintage Mira Bella [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Butera Royal Vintage Mira Bella [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/09/stogie-reviews-butera-royal-vintage.html/comment-page-1#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 21:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/09/stogie-reviews-butera-royal-vintage.html#comment-216</guid>
		<description>I had never even heard of this cigar before, much less read a review of it. I&#039;ll have to check one of these out now. Thanks for the review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had never even heard of this cigar before, much less read a review of it. I&#8217;ll have to check one of these out now. Thanks for the review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray C</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/09/stogie-reviews-butera-royal-vintage.html/comment-page-1#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/09/stogie-reviews-butera-royal-vintage.html#comment-215</guid>
		<description>Any coincidence that the &lt;B&gt;Butera&lt;/B&gt; looks so &lt;B&gt;buttery&lt;/B&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any coincidence that the <b>Butera</b> looks so <b>buttery</b>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
