<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stogie Reviews: Camacho Coyolar Puro Torpedo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/11/stogie-reviews-camacho-coyolar-puro.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/11/stogie-reviews-camacho-coyolar-puro.html</link>
	<description>Blowin’  Smoke on Everything Cigars - cigar reviews, news and commentary 7 days a week</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:25:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Bresky</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/11/stogie-reviews-camacho-coyolar-puro.html/comment-page-1#comment-95423</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Bresky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stogieguys.com/?p=145#comment-95423</guid>
		<description>This is my favorite in the Camacho line. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is my favorite in the Camacho line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeanne Phelps</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/11/stogie-reviews-camacho-coyolar-puro.html/comment-page-1#comment-67996</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeanne Phelps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stogieguys.com/?p=145#comment-67996</guid>
		<description>hi 
6crx7pegffqcp2a8 
good luck </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi</p>
<p>6crx7pegffqcp2a8</p>
<p>good luck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hannah Salazar</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/11/stogie-reviews-camacho-coyolar-puro.html/comment-page-1#comment-67837</link>
		<dc:creator>Hannah Salazar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stogieguys.com/?p=145#comment-67837</guid>
		<description>hi 
6crx7pegffqcp2a8 
good luck </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi</p>
<p>6crx7pegffqcp2a8</p>
<p>good luck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stogie News: Camacho Cigars Purchased by Davidoff</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/11/stogie-reviews-camacho-coyolar-puro.html/comment-page-1#comment-56230</link>
		<dc:creator>Stogie News: Camacho Cigars Purchased by Davidoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stogieguys.com/?p=145#comment-56230</guid>
		<description>[...] has extensively reviewed Camacho&#8217;s cigars, including the Candela Monarca, Corojo Churchill, Coyolar Puro Torpedo, Select Robusto, and the Triple Maduro [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has extensively reviewed Camacho&#8217;s cigars, including the Candela Monarca, Corojo Churchill, Coyolar Puro Torpedo, Select Robusto, and the Triple Maduro [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Stogie Guys &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stogie Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/11/stogie-reviews-camacho-coyolar-puro.html/comment-page-1#comment-804</link>
		<dc:creator>The Stogie Guys &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stogie Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stogieguys.com/?p=145#comment-804</guid>
		<description>[...] Camacho Coyolar Puro Torpedo [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Camacho Coyolar Puro Torpedo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/11/stogie-reviews-camacho-coyolar-puro.html/comment-page-1#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 05:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stogieguys.com/?p=145#comment-406</guid>
		<description>George, 
 
Yes, The SLR has the bright red band. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George, </p>
<p>Yes, The SLR has the bright red band.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George E.</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/11/stogie-reviews-camacho-coyolar-puro.html/comment-page-1#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>George E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 22:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stogieguys.com/?p=145#comment-405</guid>
		<description>Walt - Thanks. I&#039;ve smoked a few Camachos,  but haven&#039;t had an SLR. That&#039;s the one with the red band, right? I&#039;ll definitely have to pick one up. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walt &#8211; Thanks. I&#039;ve smoked a few Camachos,  but haven&#039;t had an SLR. That&#039;s the one with the red band, right? I&#039;ll definitely have to pick one up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/11/stogie-reviews-camacho-coyolar-puro.html/comment-page-1#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 18:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stogieguys.com/?p=145#comment-404</guid>
		<description>George, 
 
Thanks for the review. 
 
Ive smoked a few of these and really enjoy them. My first impression was the same as yours before I smoked the first one. After reading all of the reviews that stated how powerful this cigar was, I really expecting a much fuller cigar. 
 
I would recommend picking up a Camacho SLR. I really think that cigar is much more &quot;powerful&quot; then the Coyolar. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George, </p>
<p>Thanks for the review. </p>
<p>Ive smoked a few of these and really enjoy them. My first impression was the same as yours before I smoked the first one. After reading all of the reviews that stated how powerful this cigar was, I really expecting a much fuller cigar. </p>
<p>I would recommend picking up a Camacho SLR. I really think that cigar is much more &quot;powerful&quot; then the Coyolar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George E.</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/11/stogie-reviews-camacho-coyolar-puro.html/comment-page-1#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>George E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 11:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stogieguys.com/?p=145#comment-403</guid>
		<description>Gerald - Oops. I misread your comment. Sorry about that. What kept me from rating it higher was what I felt was a somewhat flatness in the taste. None of the flavors really reached the level that I&#039;ve had in other smokes. Even the tobacco taste, which I enjoyed, was only about average. And that&#039;s what I consider a three out of five. Not bad, but also not one that I would eagerly await smoking again. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gerald &#8211; Oops. I misread your comment. Sorry about that. What kept me from rating it higher was what I felt was a somewhat flatness in the taste. None of the flavors really reached the level that I&#039;ve had in other smokes. Even the tobacco taste, which I enjoyed, was only about average. And that&#039;s what I consider a three out of five. Not bad, but also not one that I would eagerly await smoking again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George E.</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2006/11/stogie-reviews-camacho-coyolar-puro.html/comment-page-1#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>George E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 11:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stogieguys.com/?p=145#comment-402</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed the complexity as it changed tastes througout. Those I mentioned were most prominent: woodsy and leather. And there was pepper, some sweetness and just a good, full tobacco taste. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed the complexity as it changed tastes througout. Those I mentioned were most prominent: woodsy and leather. And there was pepper, some sweetness and just a good, full tobacco taste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

