<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stogie Reviews: Rocky Patel Connecticut Robusto</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/04/04302007-stogie-reviews-rocky-patel-connecticut-robusto.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/04/04302007-stogie-reviews-rocky-patel-connecticut-robusto.html</link>
	<description>Blowin’  Smoke on Everything Cigars - cigar reviews, news and commentary 7 days a week</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:36:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/04/04302007-stogie-reviews-rocky-patel-connecticut-robusto.html/comment-page-1#comment-121280</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/04/04302007-stogie-reviews-rocky-patel-connecticut-robusto.html#comment-121280</guid>
		<description>I never had this connecticut RP. I have tried the Vintage 1999 Connecticut Robusto. Good smoke but I had some construction issues. I got a real creamy flavor throughout but no real strength. My full review: http://wp.me/pSZbU-f2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never had this connecticut RP. I have tried the Vintage 1999 Connecticut Robusto. Good smoke but I had some construction issues. I got a real creamy flavor throughout but no real strength. My full review: <a href="http://wp.me/pSZbU-f2" rel="nofollow">http://wp.me/pSZbU-f2</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/04/04302007-stogie-reviews-rocky-patel-connecticut-robusto.html/comment-page-1#comment-115660</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 02:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/04/04302007-stogie-reviews-rocky-patel-connecticut-robusto.html#comment-115660</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve tried one and this was more pleasant than the barrel aged I&#039;ve tried. I&#039;ve also tried RP vintage 1990 and this one is as good. It burns evenly and long and has a very enjoyable flavor. I tasted spice and earth at the beginning and then a creamy taste at the middle and end. I would buy a box of these without thinking twice. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve tried one and this was more pleasant than the barrel aged I&#039;ve tried. I&#039;ve also tried RP vintage 1990 and this one is as good. It burns evenly and long and has a very enjoyable flavor. I tasted spice and earth at the beginning and then a creamy taste at the middle and end. I would buy a box of these without thinking twice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill H</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/04/04302007-stogie-reviews-rocky-patel-connecticut-robusto.html/comment-page-1#comment-102394</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/04/04302007-stogie-reviews-rocky-patel-connecticut-robusto.html#comment-102394</guid>
		<description>Hey bro, I seriously think there is something wrong with YOUR taste buds, because there are a TON of die-hard connecticut cigar smokers out here in cigar land and we don&#039;t seem to be picking up anything chemically.  Maybe it&#039;s time for you to go get a check-up :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey bro, I seriously think there is something wrong with YOUR taste buds, because there are a TON of die-hard connecticut cigar smokers out here in cigar land and we don&#039;t seem to be picking up anything chemically.  Maybe it&#039;s time for you to go get a check-up <img src='http://www.stogieguys.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quick Smoke: Rocky Patel Connecticut Toro</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/04/04302007-stogie-reviews-rocky-patel-connecticut-robusto.html/comment-page-1#comment-82709</link>
		<dc:creator>Quick Smoke: Rocky Patel Connecticut Toro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 08:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/04/04302007-stogie-reviews-rocky-patel-connecticut-robusto.html#comment-82709</guid>
		<description>[...] Connecticut-wrapped sticks, the actual flavor includes the same sour, chemically aftertaste as the Robusto. While the physical properties are top-notch and the price is friendly (about $4 apiece), those [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Connecticut-wrapped sticks, the actual flavor includes the same sour, chemically aftertaste as the Robusto. While the physical properties are top-notch and the price is friendly (about $4 apiece), those [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick A</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/04/04302007-stogie-reviews-rocky-patel-connecticut-robusto.html/comment-page-1#comment-4438</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/04/04302007-stogie-reviews-rocky-patel-connecticut-robusto.html#comment-4438</guid>
		<description>George, 
 
That&#039;s an excellent question. Give me six months to a year and I&#039;ll get back to you. 
 
Actually, in all seriousness, the Cusano 18 Double Connecticut I reviewed in November had been in my humidor for quite some time.  
 
This cigar, however, was fairly new. I have a few more, and I&#039;ll wait quite awhile before trying another. 
 
If anybody else out there has some good info on this question, please feel free to chime in. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George,</p>
<p>That&#039;s an excellent question. Give me six months to a year and I&#039;ll get back to you.</p>
<p>Actually, in all seriousness, the Cusano 18 Double Connecticut I reviewed in November had been in my humidor for quite some time. </p>
<p>This cigar, however, was fairly new. I have a few more, and I&#039;ll wait quite awhile before trying another.</p>
<p>If anybody else out there has some good info on this question, please feel free to chime in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George E</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/04/04302007-stogie-reviews-rocky-patel-connecticut-robusto.html/comment-page-1#comment-4437</link>
		<dc:creator>George E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/04/04302007-stogie-reviews-rocky-patel-connecticut-robusto.html#comment-4437</guid>
		<description>Patrick -  
  Do you find that aging cigars with Connecticut Shade wrappers for 6 months or even a year has any effect on that aftertaste? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick &#8211; </p>
<p>  Do you find that aging cigars with Connecticut Shade wrappers for 6 months or even a year has any effect on that aftertaste?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick A</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/04/04302007-stogie-reviews-rocky-patel-connecticut-robusto.html/comment-page-1#comment-4435</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/04/04302007-stogie-reviews-rocky-patel-connecticut-robusto.html#comment-4435</guid>
		<description>In my experience, while the Vintage 1999 also has a Connecticut Shade wrapper and Nicaraguan and Dominican filler tobaccos, it doesn&#039;t have that chemical aftertaste I&#039;ve grown to despise.  
 
In the $6-10 range, the Vintage 1999s are more expensive, but I think they&#039;re also much better smokes. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my experience, while the Vintage 1999 also has a Connecticut Shade wrapper and Nicaraguan and Dominican filler tobaccos, it doesn&#039;t have that chemical aftertaste I&#039;ve grown to despise. </p>
<p>In the $6-10 range, the Vintage 1999s are more expensive, but I think they&#039;re also much better smokes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Padronnie</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/04/04302007-stogie-reviews-rocky-patel-connecticut-robusto.html/comment-page-1#comment-4434</link>
		<dc:creator>Padronnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/04/04302007-stogie-reviews-rocky-patel-connecticut-robusto.html#comment-4434</guid>
		<description>How does this compare to the RP Vintage 1999? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does this compare to the RP Vintage 1999?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

