<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stogie Reviews: Butera Vintage Select Toro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/05/05082007-stogie-reviews-butera-vintage-select-toro.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/05/05082007-stogie-reviews-butera-vintage-select-toro.html</link>
	<description>Blowin’  Smoke on Everything Cigars - cigar reviews, news and commentary 7 days a week</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:04:43 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patrick A</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/05/05082007-stogie-reviews-butera-vintage-select-toro.html/comment-page-1#comment-4729</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 13:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/05/05082007-stogie-reviews-butera-vintage-select-toro.html#comment-4729</guid>
		<description>Padronnie,

I think that may have something to do with the different cameras used to produce the two photos. I remember this cigar looking less impressive in person.

Also, I&#039;d have to say the Vintage Select looks more like the Dona Flor than the Alonso -- especially when you consider color.

Still, this cigar&#039;s wrapper is anything but perfect. Rough, bumpy textures and coarse veins dot its landscape.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Padronnie,</p>
<p>I think that may have something to do with the different cameras used to produce the two photos. I remember this cigar looking less impressive in person.</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;d have to say the Vintage Select looks more like the Dona Flor than the Alonso &#8212; especially when you consider color.</p>
<p>Still, this cigar&#8217;s wrapper is anything but perfect. Rough, bumpy textures and coarse veins dot its landscape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Padronnie</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/05/05082007-stogie-reviews-butera-vintage-select-toro.html/comment-page-1#comment-4728</link>
		<dc:creator>Padronnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 13:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/05/05082007-stogie-reviews-butera-vintage-select-toro.html#comment-4728</guid>
		<description>At least from the photo, the butera wrapper looks considerably less rough/rustic than the Alonso Menendez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least from the photo, the butera wrapper looks considerably less rough/rustic than the Alonso Menendez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac and Nudo</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/05/05082007-stogie-reviews-butera-vintage-select-toro.html/comment-page-1#comment-4726</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac and Nudo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 13:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/05/05082007-stogie-reviews-butera-vintage-select-toro.html#comment-4726</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great review. Sounds like this cigar would be an excellent option for those of us who have a hard time finding Dona Flors and Alonsos -- but still need a Mata Fina fix.

And for the flavors and construction you describe, I&#039;d have no qualms about laying down $8 for one of these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great review. Sounds like this cigar would be an excellent option for those of us who have a hard time finding Dona Flors and Alonsos &#8212; but still need a Mata Fina fix.</p>
<p>And for the flavors and construction you describe, I&#8217;d have no qualms about laying down $8 for one of these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
