<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick Smoke: Macanudo Hampton Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/08/08192007-quick-smoke-macanudo-hampton-court.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/08/08192007-quick-smoke-macanudo-hampton-court.html</link>
	<description>Blowin’  Smoke on Everything Cigars - cigar reviews, news and commentary 7 days a week</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:25:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cigarmonkey</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/08/08192007-quick-smoke-macanudo-hampton-court.html/comment-page-1#comment-9395</link>
		<dc:creator>Cigarmonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 21:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/08/08192007-quick-smoke-macanudo-hampton-court.html#comment-9395</guid>
		<description>I have to pick one up and give it a try. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to pick one up and give it a try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick A</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/08/08192007-quick-smoke-macanudo-hampton-court.html/comment-page-1#comment-9351</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 16:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/08/08192007-quick-smoke-macanudo-hampton-court.html#comment-9351</guid>
		<description>Yes, I know exactly what you mean by the bland and papery tastes of the Café line. For some reason, though, all the Hampton Courts I&#039;ve had have been much better with a pleasant tobacco flavor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I know exactly what you mean by the bland and papery tastes of the Café line. For some reason, though, all the Hampton Courts I&#8217;ve had have been much better with a pleasant tobacco flavor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cigarmonkey</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/08/08192007-quick-smoke-macanudo-hampton-court.html/comment-page-1#comment-9347</link>
		<dc:creator>cigarmonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 13:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/08/08192007-quick-smoke-macanudo-hampton-court.html#comment-9347</guid>
		<description>Last night, I just smoked the Prince Phillip and I have to tell you that it was disappointing. You are correct that the cafe series lacks the taste of a rich smoke. It was mild and bland. It tasted like paper. However, it was well constructed. I guess I am use to smoking too many bold smokes.

I too am not a Macanudo fan but I do like the Hyde Park. It never fails to dissappoint. You may want to give that a try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night, I just smoked the Prince Phillip and I have to tell you that it was disappointing. You are correct that the cafe series lacks the taste of a rich smoke. It was mild and bland. It tasted like paper. However, it was well constructed. I guess I am use to smoking too many bold smokes.</p>
<p>I too am not a Macanudo fan but I do like the Hyde Park. It never fails to dissappoint. You may want to give that a try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

