<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stogie Reviews: Padilla Series ’68 Robusto</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11052007-stogie-review-padilla-series-68-robusto.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11052007-stogie-review-padilla-series-68-robusto.html</link>
	<description>Blowin’  Smoke on Everything Cigars - cigar reviews, news and commentary 7 days a week</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:25:52 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: not a patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11052007-stogie-review-padilla-series-68-robusto.html/comment-page-1#comment-82663</link>
		<dc:creator>not a patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 23:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11052007-stogie-review-padilla-series-68-robusto.html#comment-82663</guid>
		<description>Smoking one of these as i type. Ashby, your experience mirrors that of my own. The burn is unlike anything i have seen with inconsistency. Despite the age i have tried to give it this smoke is giving me far less flavor then you given it. Besides the inconsistent burn i would say there is nothing memorable about this cigar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smoking one of these as i type. Ashby, your experience mirrors that of my own. The burn is unlike anything i have seen with inconsistency. Despite the age i have tried to give it this smoke is giving me far less flavor then you given it. Besides the inconsistent burn i would say there is nothing memorable about this cigar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Padilla Series &#8216;68 Toro &#171; Matt&#8217;s Cigar Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11052007-stogie-review-padilla-series-68-robusto.html/comment-page-1#comment-65017</link>
		<dc:creator>Padilla Series &#8216;68 Toro &#171; Matt&#8217;s Cigar Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11052007-stogie-review-padilla-series-68-robusto.html#comment-65017</guid>
		<description>[...] The Stogie Guys give the &#8216;68 a respectable 3.5 out of 5 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Stogie Guys give the &#8216;68 a respectable 3.5 out of 5 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George E</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11052007-stogie-review-padilla-series-68-robusto.html/comment-page-1#comment-13436</link>
		<dc:creator>George E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11052007-stogie-review-padilla-series-68-robusto.html#comment-13436</guid>
		<description>Also, the 1932 is named in honor of the year Ernesto&#039;s father was born. You can see another recognition of Heberto with the pen nib incorporated into the band of many Padilla cigars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, the 1932 is named in honor of the year Ernesto&#8217;s father was born. You can see another recognition of Heberto with the pen nib incorporated into the band of many Padilla cigars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick A</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11052007-stogie-review-padilla-series-68-robusto.html/comment-page-1#comment-13434</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11052007-stogie-review-padilla-series-68-robusto.html#comment-13434</guid>
		<description>The Signature 1932 is an ultra-premium line blended by Ernesto and “Don Pepin” García. It is full-bodied with strong tastes of cedar.

You can expect to pay in excess of $13 for a single stick. The Churchill earned a rating of 90 in the December 2006 issue of &lt;em&gt;Cigar Aficionado&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Signature 1932 is an ultra-premium line blended by Ernesto and “Don Pepin” García. It is full-bodied with strong tastes of cedar.</p>
<p>You can expect to pay in excess of $13 for a single stick. The Churchill earned a rating of 90 in the December 2006 issue of <em>Cigar Aficionado</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Padronnie</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11052007-stogie-review-padilla-series-68-robusto.html/comment-page-1#comment-13427</link>
		<dc:creator>Padronnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11052007-stogie-review-padilla-series-68-robusto.html#comment-13427</guid>
		<description>I get this confused with the Padilla 1932, what is the deal with that cigar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get this confused with the Padilla 1932, what is the deal with that cigar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Augenstien</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11052007-stogie-review-padilla-series-68-robusto.html/comment-page-1#comment-13425</link>
		<dc:creator>Augenstien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11052007-stogie-review-padilla-series-68-robusto.html#comment-13425</guid>
		<description>Great review. I especially like the photo. You guys have really improved the pics on this site over the last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review. I especially like the photo. You guys have really improved the pics on this site over the last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
