Comments on: Stogie Reviews: Padilla Series ’68 Robusto

By: Skraymer

Skraymer — Thu, 18 Nov 2010 04:09:57 +0000

Good review. 'Happy to see some of the same descriptive words written here that I had in mind when smoking this. I just wanted to say that I did not have to correct the burn more than one time. Draw was loose and burn was great. peace.

By: Stogie Reviews: Padilla Series ’68 Robusto

Stogie Reviews: Padilla Series ’68 Robusto — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 13:33:12 +0000

[...] I couldn’t help but wonder whether what was clearly a good cigar—my colleague awarded it three and a half stogies when he reviewed it—became a great one because I was so attuned to it. With aged cigars, I [...]

By: not a patrick

not a patrick — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 18:00:14 +0000

Smoking one of these as i type. Ashby, your experience mirrors that of my own. The burn is unlike anything i have seen with inconsistency. Despite the age i have tried to give it this smoke is giving me far less flavor then you given it. Besides the inconsistent burn i would say there is nothing memorable about this cigar.

By: Padilla Series ‘68 Toro « Matt’s Cigar Journal

Padilla Series ‘68 Toro « Matt’s Cigar Journal — Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:41:14 +0000

[...] The Stogie Guys give the ‘68 a respectable 3.5 out of 5 [...]

By: George E

George E — Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:57:08 +0000

Also, the 1932 is named in honor of the year Ernesto's father was born. You can see another recognition of Heberto with the pen nib incorporated into the band of many Padilla cigars.

By: Patrick A

Patrick A — Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:43:34 +0000

The Signature 1932 is an ultra-premium line blended by Ernesto and “Don Pepin” García. It is full-bodied with strong tastes of cedar.

You can expect to pay in excess of $13 for a single stick. The Churchill earned a rating of 90 in the December 2006 issue of Cigar Aficionado.

By: Padronnie

Padronnie — Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:03:20 +0000

I get this confused with the Padilla 1932, what is the deal with that cigar?

By: Augenstien

Augenstien — Mon, 05 Nov 2007 09:38:07 +0000

Great review. I especially like the photo. You guys have really improved the pics on this site over the last year.