Comments on: Stogie Commentary: Risky Business, This Smoking Inquiry http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11062007-stogie-commentary-risky-business-this-smoking-inquiry-stuff.html Blowin’ Smoke on Everything Cigars - cigar reviews, news and commentary 7 days a week Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:36:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Stogie Guys Friday Sampler CLXXVI http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11062007-stogie-commentary-risky-business-this-smoking-inquiry-stuff.html/comment-page-1#comment-100250 Stogie Guys Friday Sampler CLXXVI Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:02:09 +0000 http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11062007-stogie-commentary-risky-business-this-smoking-inquiry-stuff.html#comment-100250 [...] ban is justified, say anti-tobacco zealots, for very familiar reasons: preference of the majority, junk science, and the notion of legislating away “bad” [...] [...] ban is justified, say anti-tobacco zealots, for very familiar reasons: preference of the majority, junk science, and the notion of legislating away “bad” [...]

]]> By: Stogie Guys Friday Sampler CLXVIII http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11062007-stogie-commentary-risky-business-this-smoking-inquiry-stuff.html/comment-page-1#comment-94353 Stogie Guys Friday Sampler CLXVIII Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:35:00 +0000 http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11062007-stogie-commentary-risky-business-this-smoking-inquiry-stuff.html#comment-94353 [...] safe level of exposure,” said a study co-author. Such flawed “thinking” was examined in this 2007 commentary by Tampa Bureau Chief George [...] [...] safe level of exposure,” said a study co-author. Such flawed “thinking” was examined in this 2007 commentary by Tampa Bureau Chief George [...]

]]> By: Stogie News: 2007 in Review http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11062007-stogie-commentary-risky-business-this-smoking-inquiry-stuff.html/comment-page-1#comment-17229 Stogie News: 2007 in Review Thu, 27 Dec 2007 11:38:24 +0000 http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11062007-stogie-commentary-risky-business-this-smoking-inquiry-stuff.html#comment-17229 [...] -On November 6 we chased down some (non)answers from government bureaucrats. [...] [...] -On November 6 we chased down some (non)answers from government bureaucrats. [...]

]]> By: timothy fitzgerald http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11062007-stogie-commentary-risky-business-this-smoking-inquiry-stuff.html/comment-page-1#comment-13507 timothy fitzgerald Tue, 06 Nov 2007 21:45:39 +0000 http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11062007-stogie-commentary-risky-business-this-smoking-inquiry-stuff.html#comment-13507 really great article and way to try and get a decent answer. my lungs are worse from working at owens corning yrs ago and other plants while in construction. i was once told being arround this certain chemical we were working arround killed rats. i wanted to know how big the rats were lol. myself or no one else on the job would sign the release they wanted us to sign. they had a part per million they thought we could take. really great article and way to try and get a decent answer. my lungs are worse from working at owens corning yrs ago and other plants while in construction. i was once told being arround this certain chemical we were working arround killed rats. i wanted to know how big the rats were lol. myself or no one else on the job would sign the release they wanted us to sign. they had a part per million they thought we could take.

]]> By: John http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11062007-stogie-commentary-risky-business-this-smoking-inquiry-stuff.html/comment-page-1#comment-13487 John Tue, 06 Nov 2007 10:41:32 +0000 http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11062007-stogie-commentary-risky-business-this-smoking-inquiry-stuff.html#comment-13487 George, I hope you treated yourself to the most voluminous smoke-producing stogie you could get your hands on after sparring with U.S. government bureaucracies. And, that as a responsible smoker, you pointed out the risk to anyone nearby who may have been exposed to your puffing. George, I hope you treated yourself to the most voluminous smoke-producing stogie you could get your hands on after sparring with U.S. government bureaucracies. And, that as a responsible smoker, you pointed out the risk to anyone nearby who may have been exposed to your puffing.

]]> By: Mac and Nudo http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11062007-stogie-commentary-risky-business-this-smoking-inquiry-stuff.html/comment-page-1#comment-13486 Mac and Nudo Tue, 06 Nov 2007 10:34:06 +0000 http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11062007-stogie-commentary-risky-business-this-smoking-inquiry-stuff.html#comment-13486 Many thanks for this telling post. It's becoming very clear that the government's heavy-handed policies towards secondhand smoke are based more on <a href="http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv29n4/v29n4-4.pdf" rel="nofollow">fuzzy science</a> and a distaste for smokers than a sincere concern for the public health. Many thanks for this telling post.

It's becoming very clear that the government's heavy-handed policies towards secondhand smoke are based more on fuzzy science and a distaste for smokers than a sincere concern for the public health.

]]> By: Newfield http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11062007-stogie-commentary-risky-business-this-smoking-inquiry-stuff.html/comment-page-1#comment-13483 Newfield Tue, 06 Nov 2007 09:29:38 +0000 http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11062007-stogie-commentary-risky-business-this-smoking-inquiry-stuff.html#comment-13483 This is really impressive first-hand reporting. Thank you, George, for taking a break from journalistic retirement to put together this valuable piece. It's easy to see why StogieGuys is on Google News... This is really impressive first-hand reporting. Thank you, George, for taking a break from journalistic retirement to put together this valuable piece.

It's easy to see why StogieGuys is on Google News…

]]>