<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stogie Commentary: Burn ’Em, Don’t Smoke ’Em</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11202007-stogie-commentary-burn-them-dont-smoke-them.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11202007-stogie-commentary-burn-them-dont-smoke-them.html</link>
	<description>Blowin’  Smoke on Everything Cigars - cigar reviews, news and commentary 7 days a week</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:36:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siggy</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11202007-stogie-commentary-burn-them-dont-smoke-them.html/comment-page-1#comment-14735</link>
		<dc:creator>Siggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/stogie-commentary-burn-them-don%e2%80%99t-smoke-them.html#comment-14735</guid>
		<description>Socratic irony?! I thought this was all Freudian symbolism. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Socratic irony?! I thought this was all Freudian symbolism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George E</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11202007-stogie-commentary-burn-them-dont-smoke-them.html/comment-page-1#comment-14719</link>
		<dc:creator>George E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 12:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/stogie-commentary-burn-them-don%e2%80%99t-smoke-them.html#comment-14719</guid>
		<description>I think perhaps I need to work on my use of Socratic irony. 
george e. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think perhaps I need to work on my use of Socratic irony.</p>
<p>george e.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stinkie</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11202007-stogie-commentary-burn-them-dont-smoke-them.html/comment-page-1#comment-14715</link>
		<dc:creator>stinkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/stogie-commentary-burn-them-don%e2%80%99t-smoke-them.html#comment-14715</guid>
		<description>We were just talking about this in the forum. These places can make a shit cigar sound so tempting, but if they say &quot;I&#039;ll be honest, these are not the best cigars but look at the price&quot; run like hell! Because when they admit that they are &quot;not so good&quot; you will be better off smoking some dried leaves off the back yard tree. I&#039;m all for a good cheap smoke but you just can&#039;t cover up crap. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We were just talking about this in the forum. These places can make a shit cigar sound so tempting, but if they say &quot;I&#039;ll be honest, these are not the best cigars but look at the price&quot; run like hell! Because when they admit that they are &quot;not so good&quot; you will be better off smoking some dried leaves off the back yard tree. I&#039;m all for a good cheap smoke but you just can&#039;t cover up crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11202007-stogie-commentary-burn-them-dont-smoke-them.html/comment-page-1#comment-14713</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/stogie-commentary-burn-them-don%e2%80%99t-smoke-them.html#comment-14713</guid>
		<description>Life is too short to smoke crappy cigars... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Life is too short to smoke crappy cigars&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick A</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11202007-stogie-commentary-burn-them-dont-smoke-them.html/comment-page-1#comment-14712</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/stogie-commentary-burn-them-don%e2%80%99t-smoke-them.html#comment-14712</guid>
		<description>In case you missed them, links to George&#8217;s great &#8220;We Smoke &#8217;Em So You Don&#8217;t Have To&#8221; series are provided below. These articles on value cigars ran from March until May. 
 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/03/0322207-stogie-commentary-we-smoke-%e2%80%99em-so-you-don%e2%80%99t-have-to.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Part I&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/04/04102007-stogie-commentary-we-smoke-%e2%80%99em-so-you-don%e2%80%99t-have-to-part-ii.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Part II&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/04/04182007-stogie-commentary-we-smoke-%e2%80%99em-so-you-don%e2%80%99t-have-to-part-iii.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Part III&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/05/stogie-commentary-we-smoke-%e2%80%99em-so-you-don%e2%80%99t-have-to-part-iv.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Part IV&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/05/05302007-stogie-commentary-we-smoke-%e2%80%99em-so-you-don%e2%80%99t-have-to-part-v.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Part V&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you missed them, links to George&rsquo;s great &ldquo;We Smoke &rsquo;Em So You Don&rsquo;t Have To&rdquo; series are provided below. These articles on value cigars ran from March until May.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/03/0322207-stogie-commentary-we-smoke-%e2%80%99em-so-you-don%e2%80%99t-have-to.html" rel="nofollow">Part I</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/04/04102007-stogie-commentary-we-smoke-%e2%80%99em-so-you-don%e2%80%99t-have-to-part-ii.html" rel="nofollow">Part II</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/04/04182007-stogie-commentary-we-smoke-%e2%80%99em-so-you-don%e2%80%99t-have-to-part-iii.html" rel="nofollow">Part III</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/05/stogie-commentary-we-smoke-%e2%80%99em-so-you-don%e2%80%99t-have-to-part-iv.html" rel="nofollow">Part IV</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/05/05302007-stogie-commentary-we-smoke-%e2%80%99em-so-you-don%e2%80%99t-have-to-part-v.html" rel="nofollow">Part V</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Carlson</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/11202007-stogie-commentary-burn-them-dont-smoke-them.html/comment-page-1#comment-14705</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Carlson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2007/11/stogie-commentary-burn-them-don%e2%80%99t-smoke-them.html#comment-14705</guid>
		<description>Group buy? I think not.  
 
At the risk of sounding like a snob, I don&#039;t have any desire to try those cigars -- especially since the manufacturer admits up front they&#039;re not very good. 
 
Maybe George should take one for the team, kinda like his excellent series on value sticks. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Group buy? I think not. </p>
<p>At the risk of sounding like a snob, I don&#039;t have any desire to try those cigars &#8212; especially since the manufacturer admits up front they&#039;re not very good.</p>
<p>Maybe George should take one for the team, kinda like his excellent series on value sticks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

