<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stogie Commentary: The Anti-Smoking Bias</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogieguys.com/2008/04/04032008-stogie-commentary-the-anti-smoking-bias.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2008/04/04032008-stogie-commentary-the-anti-smoking-bias.html</link>
	<description>Blowin’  Smoke on Everything Cigars - cigar reviews, news and commentary 7 days a week</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:52:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stogie News: Debunking The Junk Science Behind The Anti-Tobacco Movement</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2008/04/04032008-stogie-commentary-the-anti-smoking-bias.html/comment-page-1#comment-72396</link>
		<dc:creator>Stogie News: Debunking The Junk Science Behind The Anti-Tobacco Movement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2008/04/04032008-stogie-commentary-the-anti-smoking-bias.html#comment-72396</guid>
		<description>[...] Now if the tobacco industry was presenting study after study that concluded that we need fewer smoking bans and lower tobacco taxes, you can bet that reporters and politicians wouldn&#8217;t unquestioningly believe their claims. However, when the anti-tobacco industry has a study that agrees with their anti-tobacco agenda, the results are dutifully reported as scientific fact without so much as a second look. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Now if the tobacco industry was presenting study after study that concluded that we need fewer smoking bans and lower tobacco taxes, you can bet that reporters and politicians wouldn&#8217;t unquestioningly believe their claims. However, when the anti-tobacco industry has a study that agrees with their anti-tobacco agenda, the results are dutifully reported as scientific fact without so much as a second look. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmj</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2008/04/04032008-stogie-commentary-the-anti-smoking-bias.html/comment-page-1#comment-29354</link>
		<dc:creator>dmj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 11:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2008/04/04032008-stogie-commentary-the-anti-smoking-bias.html#comment-29354</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s all very similar to the argument that environmentalists make against studies showing that global warming is either not as bad as they say or that it is not manmade--they accuse the studies of being funded by &quot;big oil.&quot; As if they had no agenda themselves and their motives as as pure as the wind-drive snow. I fear the next 4 or more years will be very expensive for anyone who smokes (cigars, pipes, or those &quot;evil&quot; cigarettes) as well as for all of us who would like to drive a bigger and safer vehicle. With the candidates running for office, I see no way that SCHIP isn&#039;t passed and enviros aren&#039;t pandered to. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s all very similar to the argument that environmentalists make against studies showing that global warming is either not as bad as they say or that it is not manmade&#8211;they accuse the studies of being funded by &quot;big oil.&quot; As if they had no agenda themselves and their motives as as pure as the wind-drive snow. I fear the next 4 or more years will be very expensive for anyone who smokes (cigars, pipes, or those &quot;evil&quot; cigarettes) as well as for all of us who would like to drive a bigger and safer vehicle. With the candidates running for office, I see no way that SCHIP isn&#039;t passed and enviros aren&#039;t pandered to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon N.</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2008/04/04032008-stogie-commentary-the-anti-smoking-bias.html/comment-page-1#comment-29275</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2008/04/04032008-stogie-commentary-the-anti-smoking-bias.html#comment-29275</guid>
		<description>Apropos of nothing, I just want to add that that mad scientist picture is hilarious. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apropos of nothing, I just want to add that that mad scientist picture is hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeorgeH</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2008/04/04032008-stogie-commentary-the-anti-smoking-bias.html/comment-page-1#comment-29259</link>
		<dc:creator>GeorgeH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 18:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/2008/04/04032008-stogie-commentary-the-anti-smoking-bias.html#comment-29259</guid>
		<description>Patrick - I hope our friends in the cigar industry see and learn the absolute shameless behavior of the anti-tobacco lobby.  SCHIP will be back in the new Congress and worse than before even if Republicans retain the White House.  We need to hammer home to all Members that &quot;small business&quot;/&quot;mom and pop&quot; are the real losers if taxes destroy the cigar industry. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick &#8211; I hope our friends in the cigar industry see and learn the absolute shameless behavior of the anti-tobacco lobby.  SCHIP will be back in the new Congress and worse than before even if Republicans retain the White House.  We need to hammer home to all Members that &quot;small business&quot;/&quot;mom and pop&quot; are the real losers if taxes destroy the cigar industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

