<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stogie Commentary: In Defense of Mild Cigars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogieguys.com/2008/07/07212008-stogie-commentary-in-defense-of-mild-cigars.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2008/07/07212008-stogie-commentary-in-defense-of-mild-cigars.html</link>
	<description>Blowin’  Smoke on Everything Cigars - cigar reviews, news and commentary 7 days a week</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:36:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stogie Commentary: An Undeserved Reputation</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2008/07/07212008-stogie-commentary-in-defense-of-mild-cigars.html/comment-page-1#comment-132651</link>
		<dc:creator>Stogie Commentary: An Undeserved Reputation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=1297#comment-132651</guid>
		<description>[...] perceived as a misguided attempt to prove one’s manhood. Mild cigars, as my former colleague once wrote, “can and should remain part of a well-balanced collection. We should not consider ourselves too [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] perceived as a misguided attempt to prove one’s manhood. Mild cigars, as my former colleague once wrote, “can and should remain part of a well-balanced collection. We should not consider ourselves too [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stogie Reviews: Perdomo Reserve 10th Anniversary Champagne Robusto</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2008/07/07212008-stogie-commentary-in-defense-of-mild-cigars.html/comment-page-1#comment-64669</link>
		<dc:creator>Stogie Reviews: Perdomo Reserve 10th Anniversary Champagne Robusto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=1297#comment-64669</guid>
		<description>[...] for those of you who consider yourselves too macho for Connecticut shade tobacco, don’t write off the Reserve 10th Anniversary Champagne just [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for those of you who consider yourselves too macho for Connecticut shade tobacco, don’t write off the Reserve 10th Anniversary Champagne just [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stogie Reviews: Romeo y Julieta Aniversario Toro</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2008/07/07212008-stogie-commentary-in-defense-of-mild-cigars.html/comment-page-1#comment-61566</link>
		<dc:creator>Stogie Reviews: Romeo y Julieta Aniversario Toro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=1297#comment-61566</guid>
		<description>[...] after the midway point; the flavor is consistent to a fault, even for those of us who appreciate milder [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] after the midway point; the flavor is consistent to a fault, even for those of us who appreciate milder [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fundacion Ancestral Pinar del Rio 1941 &#171; Keepers of the Flame</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2008/07/07212008-stogie-commentary-in-defense-of-mild-cigars.html/comment-page-1#comment-58366</link>
		<dc:creator>Fundacion Ancestral Pinar del Rio 1941 &#171; Keepers of the Flame</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 01:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=1297#comment-58366</guid>
		<description>[...] there&#8217;s no arguing with taste I find that I frequently disagree, and I&#8217;m happy to say I&#8217;m not alone. There is much to be said for the subtleties of milder cigars like the Fundación Ancestral (which [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there&#8217;s no arguing with taste I find that I frequently disagree, and I&#8217;m happy to say I&#8217;m not alone. There is much to be said for the subtleties of milder cigars like the Fundación Ancestral (which [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stogie Reviews: Cuban Crafters Medina 1959 Torpedo</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2008/07/07212008-stogie-commentary-in-defense-of-mild-cigars.html/comment-page-1#comment-57013</link>
		<dc:creator>Stogie Reviews: Cuban Crafters Medina 1959 Torpedo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=1297#comment-57013</guid>
		<description>[...] confidently say this vitola is just as soothing and delicately delicious as the Robusto. Fans of milder tobacco should not let the $9.20 per cigar MSRP impede them from at least trying the Cuban Crafters [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] confidently say this vitola is just as soothing and delicately delicious as the Robusto. Fans of milder tobacco should not let the $9.20 per cigar MSRP impede them from at least trying the Cuban Crafters [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stogie Guys Friday Sampler CXIV</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2008/07/07212008-stogie-commentary-in-defense-of-mild-cigars.html/comment-page-1#comment-47923</link>
		<dc:creator>Stogie Guys Friday Sampler CXIV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 08:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=1297#comment-47923</guid>
		<description>[...] Deal of the Week: Not long ago, Jon N. praised the virtues of mild cigars. In that spirit, we present this sampler of ten top notch mild cigars. For just $34.99 you get two [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Deal of the Week: Not long ago, Jon N. praised the virtues of mild cigars. In that spirit, we present this sampler of ten top notch mild cigars. For just $34.99 you get two [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stogie Reviews: CAO L’Anniversaire Cameroon Robusto</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2008/07/07212008-stogie-commentary-in-defense-of-mild-cigars.html/comment-page-1#comment-44708</link>
		<dc:creator>Stogie Reviews: CAO L’Anniversaire Cameroon Robusto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=1297#comment-44708</guid>
		<description>[...] the heels of my colleague’s thoughtful commentary that encouraged us to “not consider ourselves too macho, too old, too cool, or too proud to smoke [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the heels of my colleague’s thoughtful commentary that encouraged us to “not consider ourselves too macho, too old, too cool, or too proud to smoke [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2008/07/07212008-stogie-commentary-in-defense-of-mild-cigars.html/comment-page-1#comment-44314</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=1297#comment-44314</guid>
		<description>Great post, Jon. I almost always go for something mild or mild-medium with morning coffee. PLPCs, Fonseca Delicias, or something CT shade-wrapped like an LTC or Gran Habano #1 is perfect while clearing the cobwebs. I&#039;d recommend those smokes to anyone, anytime. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Jon. I almost always go for something mild or mild-medium with morning coffee. PLPCs, Fonseca Delicias, or something CT shade-wrapped like an LTC or Gran Habano #1 is perfect while clearing the cobwebs. I&#039;d recommend those smokes to anyone, anytime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielle</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2008/07/07212008-stogie-commentary-in-defense-of-mild-cigars.html/comment-page-1#comment-43891</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 13:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=1297#comment-43891</guid>
		<description>Jon, thank you for your post! And to everyone for their very insightful responses.  
 
As you noted, everyone&#039;s palette is unique and therefore two enthusiasts smoking the same cigar may have very different experiences not unlike food and wine tasting.  
 
My personal preference is a full-flavored cigar that offers a smooth, balanced complexity and multiple taste nuances. Davidoff provides this very experience throughout their entire product line from the Classic to the Mille Series&#039;, from the Grand Cru to the Aniversario Series&#039;, and the Special Series to the Millennium Blend Series.  
 
The Classic No. 2 is very flavorful and what many would consider &quot;mild&quot; by definition while our Aniversario No. 3 and Millennium Blend Toro are considered Davidoff&#039;s fullest-bodied offerings. Our world-renown Master Blender, Henke Kelner, strives to create blends that are smooth, complex and balanced--engaging all the sensory areas of both taste and smell--with a range in body to delight every palette. 
 
I&#039;m conscious of pairing my cigars depending on a number of factors including time of day, whether it&#039;s my only cigar of the day or the first of 2 or 3, my beverage of choice at the time or the meal that I will or have enjoyed. Of course, the parameters are different for everyone--part of the beauty of cigar smoking! 
 
The premium product lines from the House of Davidoff include: Davidoff, the annual Davidoff Limited Edition, Zino Classic, Griffins, Winston Churchill, Zino Platinum and Avo.    
 
Here&#039;s to enjoying the good life! 
 
Best regards, 
Danielle Hawthorne 
Brand Manager- Davidoff/Zino Classic 
Davidoff of Geneva </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon, thank you for your post! And to everyone for their very insightful responses. </p>
<p>As you noted, everyone&#039;s palette is unique and therefore two enthusiasts smoking the same cigar may have very different experiences not unlike food and wine tasting. </p>
<p>My personal preference is a full-flavored cigar that offers a smooth, balanced complexity and multiple taste nuances. Davidoff provides this very experience throughout their entire product line from the Classic to the Mille Series&#039;, from the Grand Cru to the Aniversario Series&#039;, and the Special Series to the Millennium Blend Series. </p>
<p>The Classic No. 2 is very flavorful and what many would consider &quot;mild&quot; by definition while our Aniversario No. 3 and Millennium Blend Toro are considered Davidoff&#039;s fullest-bodied offerings. Our world-renown Master Blender, Henke Kelner, strives to create blends that are smooth, complex and balanced&#8211;engaging all the sensory areas of both taste and smell&#8211;with a range in body to delight every palette.</p>
<p>I&#039;m conscious of pairing my cigars depending on a number of factors including time of day, whether it&#039;s my only cigar of the day or the first of 2 or 3, my beverage of choice at the time or the meal that I will or have enjoyed. Of course, the parameters are different for everyone&#8211;part of the beauty of cigar smoking!</p>
<p>The premium product lines from the House of Davidoff include: Davidoff, the annual Davidoff Limited Edition, Zino Classic, Griffins, Winston Churchill, Zino Platinum and Avo.   </p>
<p>Here&#039;s to enjoying the good life!</p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>Danielle Hawthorne</p>
<p>Brand Manager- Davidoff/Zino Classic</p>
<p>Davidoff of Geneva</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon N.</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2008/07/07212008-stogie-commentary-in-defense-of-mild-cigars.html/comment-page-1#comment-43881</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=1297#comment-43881</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a very good point. Just as people sometimes confuse body and quality, people often confuse body and flavor. Flavor and body are not the same things; mild-bodied cigars can be complex in flavor, and full-bodied cigars can be unsubtle and uncomplex, or vice versa.  
 
&quot;Body&quot; is, roughly speaking, the intensity with which the cigar&#039;s flavor presents itself. It is a level of amplitude, so to speak. For instance, if I were to mix one part orange juice and one part water in Glass A, and one part orange juice with two parts water in Glass B, both Glass A and Glass B would have the same flavor (that of orange juice). But Glass A would have a stronger &quot;body&quot; than Glass B. 
 
But that&#039;s an example in which all things, other than intensity of flavor, are equal. When comparing cigars, we must keep in mind that not all things are equal. Different cigars have very different flavors, and different cigars have very different bodies.  
 
Flavor can and should be one of many determinants of quality when judging a cigar. Body, however, is not; it is simply a measure of intensity and not of  quality. 
 
&quot;Strength&quot; is another word that most of us use interchangeably with &quot;body,&quot; and I&#039;ll confess to having done so many times on this site and elsewhere. Technically speaking, however, strength and body are not the same thing. Strength is supposed to refer only to the potency and level of nicotine in a cigar&#039;s tobacco. Ninety-nine percent of the time, full-bodied cigars are also stronger than milder cigars, but this is not by necessity the case. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s a very good point. Just as people sometimes confuse body and quality, people often confuse body and flavor. Flavor and body are not the same things; mild-bodied cigars can be complex in flavor, and full-bodied cigars can be unsubtle and uncomplex, or vice versa. </p>
<p>&quot;Body&quot; is, roughly speaking, the intensity with which the cigar&#039;s flavor presents itself. It is a level of amplitude, so to speak. For instance, if I were to mix one part orange juice and one part water in Glass A, and one part orange juice with two parts water in Glass B, both Glass A and Glass B would have the same flavor (that of orange juice). But Glass A would have a stronger &quot;body&quot; than Glass B.</p>
<p>But that&#039;s an example in which all things, other than intensity of flavor, are equal. When comparing cigars, we must keep in mind that not all things are equal. Different cigars have very different flavors, and different cigars have very different bodies. </p>
<p>Flavor can and should be one of many determinants of quality when judging a cigar. Body, however, is not; it is simply a measure of intensity and not of  quality.</p>
<p>&quot;Strength&quot; is another word that most of us use interchangeably with &quot;body,&quot; and I&#039;ll confess to having done so many times on this site and elsewhere. Technically speaking, however, strength and body are not the same thing. Strength is supposed to refer only to the potency and level of nicotine in a cigar&#039;s tobacco. Ninety-nine percent of the time, full-bodied cigars are also stronger than milder cigars, but this is not by necessity the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

