<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stogie Reviews: Gispert Natural Lonsdale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/01/01142009-stogie-reviews-gispert-natural-lonsdale.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/01/01142009-stogie-reviews-gispert-natural-lonsdale.html</link>
	<description>Blowin’  Smoke on Everything Cigars - cigar reviews, news and commentary 7 days a week</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:04:43 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: broad113</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/01/01142009-stogie-reviews-gispert-natural-lonsdale.html/comment-page-1#comment-100660</link>
		<dc:creator>broad113</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 02:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=3083#comment-100660</guid>
		<description>I always try to smoke a Robusto, and have never had the featured Lonsdale. I have had both the Natural and Maduro Gispert Robustos , and they are my cigars of choice. I am far from an expert, but I have smoked many brands and sizes and always come back to the Gisperts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always try to smoke a Robusto, and have never had the featured Lonsdale. I have had both the Natural and Maduro Gispert Robustos , and they are my cigars of choice. I am far from an expert, but I have smoked many brands and sizes and always come back to the Gisperts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robaino</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/01/01142009-stogie-reviews-gispert-natural-lonsdale.html/comment-page-1#comment-96802</link>
		<dc:creator>robaino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 18:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=3083#comment-96802</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree with ya on this one. I ran a blind taste test with this (among 4 other mild/medium cigars) on 8 separate people. it was the cheapest of the bunch and it rated second place on overall reviews. it also was never rated at the bottom. 

I ran this test because I swear by this cigar as a great mild morning smoke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree with ya on this one. I ran a blind taste test with this (among 4 other mild/medium cigars) on 8 separate people. it was the cheapest of the bunch and it rated second place on overall reviews. it also was never rated at the bottom. </p>
<p>I ran this test because I swear by this cigar as a great mild morning smoke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syrinxx</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/01/01142009-stogie-reviews-gispert-natural-lonsdale.html/comment-page-1#comment-69029</link>
		<dc:creator>Syrinxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=3083#comment-69029</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised to read this.  Gispert is something I almost always have on hand either for newbies or to enjoy as a morning smoke.  I can&#039;t ever remember them being flavorless and bland.  I do need to try the maduro one of these days.

Among the cigar enthusiasts I know this smoke is always recommended as a value brand.  Wonder if you got an odd stick?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised to read this.  Gispert is something I almost always have on hand either for newbies or to enjoy as a morning smoke.  I can&#8217;t ever remember them being flavorless and bland.  I do need to try the maduro one of these days.</p>
<p>Among the cigar enthusiasts I know this smoke is always recommended as a value brand.  Wonder if you got an odd stick?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beringer</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/01/01142009-stogie-reviews-gispert-natural-lonsdale.html/comment-page-1#comment-68405</link>
		<dc:creator>Beringer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=3083#comment-68405</guid>
		<description>Huh.  I&#039;m surprised.  Over the years, I&#039;ve had many of these, including my own box recently.  They were always winners - very aromatic, great taste, good burn, great buy.  Was there a hidden change recently in the manufacturing?

If you&#039;re looking for a wonderful mild recession cigar with great taste/aroma/construction/consistency/cost, it is hard to be Temple Hall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh.  I&#8217;m surprised.  Over the years, I&#8217;ve had many of these, including my own box recently.  They were always winners &#8211; very aromatic, great taste, good burn, great buy.  Was there a hidden change recently in the manufacturing?</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re looking for a wonderful mild recession cigar with great taste/aroma/construction/consistency/cost, it is hard to be Temple Hall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick A</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/01/01142009-stogie-reviews-gispert-natural-lonsdale.html/comment-page-1#comment-68365</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=3083#comment-68365</guid>
		<description>Surprising as it is, the Natural blend definitely has been highly touted by CA. The Churchill was rated 90 and featured as a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cigaraficionado.com/Cigar/CA_Daily/CA_Daily_Cigar/0,2345,309,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cigar of the Week&lt;/a&gt; back in 2004.

I&#039;ve heard that the Maduros are significantly better. Based on this experience, I can&#039;t imagine they wouldn&#039;t be...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surprising as it is, the Natural blend definitely has been highly touted by CA. The Churchill was rated 90 and featured as a <a href="http://www.cigaraficionado.com/Cigar/CA_Daily/CA_Daily_Cigar/0,2345,309,00.html" rel="nofollow">Cigar of the Week</a> back in 2004.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard that the Maduros are significantly better. Based on this experience, I can&#8217;t imagine they wouldn&#8217;t be&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CWS</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/01/01142009-stogie-reviews-gispert-natural-lonsdale.html/comment-page-1#comment-68353</link>
		<dc:creator>CWS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=3083#comment-68353</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t it the Maduro that received the high rating from CA? I had several maduros given to me and have yet to try them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t it the Maduro that received the high rating from CA? I had several maduros given to me and have yet to try them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
