<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stogie Reviews: Camacho Diploma Diploma Maduro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/02/02252009-stogie-reviews-camacho-diploma-diploma-maduro.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/02/02252009-stogie-reviews-camacho-diploma-diploma-maduro.html</link>
	<description>Blowin’  Smoke on Everything Cigars - cigar reviews, news and commentary 7 days a week</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:36:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/02/02252009-stogie-reviews-camacho-diploma-diploma-maduro.html/comment-page-1#comment-82195</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 06:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=3711#comment-82195</guid>
		<description>I was also very disappointed in the new Diplomas after a BOTL sent me a few to try. The old Diploma was the only Camacho I thought was worth the extra dough. Camacho also made a cigar for CI called the Camacho Corojo 08/22 Ltd. that was top notch. Now they don&#039;t make a cigar I truly enjoy. The Coyolar is OK. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was also very disappointed in the new Diplomas after a BOTL sent me a few to try. The old Diploma was the only Camacho I thought was worth the extra dough. Camacho also made a cigar for CI called the Camacho Corojo 08/22 Ltd. that was top notch. Now they don&#039;t make a cigar I truly enjoy. The Coyolar is OK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craig</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/02/02252009-stogie-reviews-camacho-diploma-diploma-maduro.html/comment-page-1#comment-73283</link>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=3711#comment-73283</guid>
		<description>oops, meant to refer to the horrible Camacho 1962s, not 1969s </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops, meant to refer to the horrible Camacho 1962s, not 1969s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craig</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/02/02252009-stogie-reviews-camacho-diploma-diploma-maduro.html/comment-page-1#comment-73281</link>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=3711#comment-73281</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m done with Camacho.  I&#039;ve been burned with bad SLRs and even worse 1969s.  The Coroylar can be good, although too strong for my taste.   
 
The only Camacho I would consider buying are the CI Legends.  They&#039;re not ultra-premiums, but at least they burn straight. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m done with Camacho.  I&#039;ve been burned with bad SLRs and even worse 1969s.  The Coroylar can be good, although too strong for my taste.  </p>
<p>The only Camacho I would consider buying are the CI Legends.  They&#039;re not ultra-premiums, but at least they burn straight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George E.</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/02/02252009-stogie-reviews-camacho-diploma-diploma-maduro.html/comment-page-1#comment-73171</link>
		<dc:creator>George E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=3711#comment-73171</guid>
		<description>I am thinking about changing my name. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am thinking about changing my name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick M</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/02/02252009-stogie-reviews-camacho-diploma-diploma-maduro.html/comment-page-1#comment-73108</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=3711#comment-73108</guid>
		<description>Thanks, for the welcome. It was an unfortunate experience with this cigar. The flavors had promise and with better construction it would probably be a good cigar at the $5-$6 price point. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, for the welcome. It was an unfortunate experience with this cigar. The flavors had promise and with better construction it would probably be a good cigar at the $5-$6 price point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regina</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/02/02252009-stogie-reviews-camacho-diploma-diploma-maduro.html/comment-page-1#comment-73101</link>
		<dc:creator>Regina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=3711#comment-73101</guid>
		<description>Welcome, Patrick M! The more Patricks the better, if you ask me... 
 
Sorry to hear you too had a bad experience with the Diploma maduro. I also thought the burn sucked and the draw was way too loose. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome, Patrick M! The more Patricks the better, if you ask me&#8230;</p>
<p>Sorry to hear you too had a bad experience with the Diploma maduro. I also thought the burn sucked and the draw was way too loose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick A</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/02/02252009-stogie-reviews-camacho-diploma-diploma-maduro.html/comment-page-1#comment-73094</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=3711#comment-73094</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s official from now on: When it comes to StogieGuys.com, Patricks need not apply. 
 
In all seriousness, though, we&#039;re excited to have Patrick M on board and look forward to the perspective he&#039;ll offer on the many cigars he&#039;ll review. I hope you will join me in welcoming him to the Stogie Guys family. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s official from now on: When it comes to StogieGuys.com, Patricks need not apply.</p>
<p>In all seriousness, though, we&#039;re excited to have Patrick M on board and look forward to the perspective he&#039;ll offer on the many cigars he&#039;ll review. I hope you will join me in welcoming him to the Stogie Guys family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cigarfan</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/02/02252009-stogie-reviews-camacho-diploma-diploma-maduro.html/comment-page-1#comment-73093</link>
		<dc:creator>cigarfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=3711#comment-73093</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the Camacho Maduro counterfeit test: if it burns straight, it&#039;s a fake!  
 
By the way, guys. I think you could use a few more Patricks on staff.  Maybe you could make George an honorary Patrick? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s the Camacho Maduro counterfeit test: if it burns straight, it&#039;s a fake! </p>
<p>By the way, guys. I think you could use a few more Patricks on staff.  Maybe you could make George an honorary Patrick?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

