<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stogie Commentary: Smoking Bans Revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/04/04072009-stogie-commentary-smoking-bans-revisited.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/04/04072009-stogie-commentary-smoking-bans-revisited.html</link>
	<description>Blowin’  Smoke on Everything Cigars - cigar reviews, news and commentary 7 days a week</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:36:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George E.</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/04/04072009-stogie-commentary-smoking-bans-revisited.html/comment-page-1#comment-170897</link>
		<dc:creator>George E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=4252#comment-170897</guid>
		<description>Welcome aboard! Glad you found the site. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome aboard! Glad you found the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mobile Giving</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/04/04072009-stogie-commentary-smoking-bans-revisited.html/comment-page-1#comment-170896</link>
		<dc:creator>Mobile Giving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=4252#comment-170896</guid>
		<description>Hi, I just ran across your weblog via Bing. Your article is truly applicable to my life at this moment, and I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;m really delighted I found your website. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I just ran across your weblog via Bing. Your article is truly applicable to my life at this moment, and I&acirc;&euro;&trade;m really delighted I found your website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 738668</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/04/04072009-stogie-commentary-smoking-bans-revisited.html/comment-page-1#comment-170838</link>
		<dc:creator>738668</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 19:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=4252#comment-170838</guid>
		<description>What a lovely day for a 738668!  SCK was here </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a lovely day for a 738668!  SCK was here</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmjones</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/04/04072009-stogie-commentary-smoking-bans-revisited.html/comment-page-1#comment-77575</link>
		<dc:creator>dmjones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=4252#comment-77575</guid>
		<description>Well said, ed. I have used that same argument many times and I think it&#039;s one of the strongest, specifically with the SCHIP funding issues.  
 
History has shown that raising taxes on tobacco products (or anything, for that matter--what you want to discourage, you tax) causes people to quit. So, they have based their expected revenues for SCHIP taxes based on more people smoking and paying the taxes than will actually be the case. Therefore, the funding will not be enough to cover the (liberal) politicians have promised. In the world of &quot;Big Government&quot; there is no such thing as shrinking a budget, no matter what the teachers&#039; unions may say, so instead of cutting back and making the program work with less money, they will expand the taxes to provide more funding. When tobacco tax money has dried up, they will be coming for your &quot;sacred cows,&quot; non-smokers! Don&#039;t expect me to feel sympathy for you when they raise taxes on your bottled water or your Prius. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, ed. I have used that same argument many times and I think it&#039;s one of the strongest, specifically with the SCHIP funding issues. </p>
<p>History has shown that raising taxes on tobacco products (or anything, for that matter&#8211;what you want to discourage, you tax) causes people to quit. So, they have based their expected revenues for SCHIP taxes based on more people smoking and paying the taxes than will actually be the case. Therefore, the funding will not be enough to cover the (liberal) politicians have promised. In the world of &quot;Big Government&quot; there is no such thing as shrinking a budget, no matter what the teachers&#039; unions may say, so instead of cutting back and making the program work with less money, they will expand the taxes to provide more funding. When tobacco tax money has dried up, they will be coming for your &quot;sacred cows,&quot; non-smokers! Don&#039;t expect me to feel sympathy for you when they raise taxes on your bottled water or your Prius.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/04/04072009-stogie-commentary-smoking-bans-revisited.html/comment-page-1#comment-77386</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 20:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=4252#comment-77386</guid>
		<description>Banning salt, fats,  cigars, guns, etc. is all related. The pleasure police are never happy. Read these words and stand up when the pleasure police go after something that you may not partake in because your enjoyment may be next.     &quot;In Germany, they came first for the Communists, And I didn&#8217;t speak up because I wasn&#8217;t a Communist;  And then they came for the trade unionists, And I didn&#8217;t speak up ecause I wasn&#8217;t a trade unionist; And then they came for the Jews, And I didn&#8217;t speak up because I wasn&#8217;t a Jew; 
 
 And then . . . they came for me . . . And by that time there was no one left to speak up.&quot; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Banning salt, fats,  cigars, guns, etc. is all related. The pleasure police are never happy. Read these words and stand up when the pleasure police go after something that you may not partake in because your enjoyment may be next.     &quot;In Germany, they came first for the Communists, And I didn&rsquo;t speak up because I wasn&rsquo;t a Communist;  And then they came for the trade unionists, And I didn&rsquo;t speak up ecause I wasn&rsquo;t a trade unionist; And then they came for the Jews, And I didn&rsquo;t speak up because I wasn&rsquo;t a Jew;</p>
<p> And then . . . they came for me . . . And by that time there was no one left to speak up.&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George E.</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/04/04072009-stogie-commentary-smoking-bans-revisited.html/comment-page-1#comment-77329</link>
		<dc:creator>George E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=4252#comment-77329</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a column in today&#039;s NYT science section on efforts to limit people&#039;s salt intake that makes for very interesting -- and related -- reading: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/07/science/07tier.html?_r=1&amp;8dpc&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/07/science/07tier....&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#039;s a column in today&#039;s NYT science section on efforts to limit people&#039;s salt intake that makes for very interesting &#8212; and related &#8212; reading: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/07/science/07tier.html?_r=1&amp;8dpc" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/07/science/07tier&#8230;.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

