<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stogie Reviews: Diplomáticos No. 2 (Cuban)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/05/05142009-stogie-reviews-diplomaticos-no-2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/05/05142009-stogie-reviews-diplomaticos-no-2.html</link>
	<description>Blowin’  Smoke on Everything Cigars - cigar reviews, news and commentary 7 days a week</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:25:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Werner</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/05/05142009-stogie-reviews-diplomaticos-no-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-172370</link>
		<dc:creator>John Werner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 04:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=4795#comment-172370</guid>
		<description>I have smoked several of these and not had draw or ash issues.  They are quite different than a Montecristo.  Diplimaticos are, I think, a bit strident if not smoked a bit on the slow side.  While the &quot;company line&quot; on these has been they&#039;re lighter for the French market I can not say as though I would catagorize these as mild.  The taste I get is very, well, smoky cedar and kind of vegetative like the aforementioned &quot;grassiness&quot;.  I think it is very much a medium strength that can be, at times, strong even.  To keep it from being harsh I did not take intense draws and, as such, I found this unique taste interesting and, when considered a change-up smoke, quite enjoyable.  While not a polished as the more classic tasting Monte, these sticks aren&#039;t really a second tier brand as much as a unique tasting brand.  I agree that this flavor profile is polarizing in that you either like it or you dislike it with little, if any, middle ground.  I know I fall into the &quot;like it&quot; category. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have smoked several of these and not had draw or ash issues.  They are quite different than a Montecristo.  Diplimaticos are, I think, a bit strident if not smoked a bit on the slow side.  While the &quot;company line&quot; on these has been they&#039;re lighter for the French market I can not say as though I would catagorize these as mild.  The taste I get is very, well, smoky cedar and kind of vegetative like the aforementioned &quot;grassiness&quot;.  I think it is very much a medium strength that can be, at times, strong even.  To keep it from being harsh I did not take intense draws and, as such, I found this unique taste interesting and, when considered a change-up smoke, quite enjoyable.  While not a polished as the more classic tasting Monte, these sticks aren&#039;t really a second tier brand as much as a unique tasting brand.  I agree that this flavor profile is polarizing in that you either like it or you dislike it with little, if any, middle ground.  I know I fall into the &quot;like it&quot; category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liciawilli</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/05/05142009-stogie-reviews-diplomaticos-no-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-87020</link>
		<dc:creator>liciawilli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=4795#comment-87020</guid>
		<description>microsoft beta adjust fossil agree new </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>microsoft beta adjust fossil agree new</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arturo Fuente Hemingway &#38; Diplomaticos No. 2 reviews @ Cigar Inspector</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/05/05142009-stogie-reviews-diplomaticos-no-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-81344</link>
		<dc:creator>Arturo Fuente Hemingway &#38; Diplomaticos No. 2 reviews @ Cigar Inspector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 17:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=4795#comment-81344</guid>
		<description>[...] that the Diplomaticos is not really a budget Cuban cigar, considering its poor construction. Read the full review here&#8230;. Read our review of the Diplomaticos No. 2&#8230;     If you enjoyed this article, consider [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that the Diplomaticos is not really a budget Cuban cigar, considering its poor construction. Read the full review here&#8230;. Read our review of the Diplomaticos No. 2&#8230;     If you enjoyed this article, consider [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moro</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/05/05142009-stogie-reviews-diplomaticos-no-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-80602</link>
		<dc:creator>Moro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 13:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=4795#comment-80602</guid>
		<description>Though nowhere near me favorite CC, I&#039;ve had better luck than this with the Diplomaticos No. 2. Enjoyable every now and then when I feel for a change of pace (that or a Q d&#039;O/PL). Of course I&#039;ve had no more than a dozen of these since I started; could be mere luck. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though nowhere near me favorite CC, I&#039;ve had better luck than this with the Diplomaticos No. 2. Enjoyable every now and then when I feel for a change of pace (that or a Q d&#039;O/PL). Of course I&#039;ve had no more than a dozen of these since I started; could be mere luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjy</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/05/05142009-stogie-reviews-diplomaticos-no-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-80577</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 08:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=4795#comment-80577</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the review, IMHO these 2 marques have different flavor profiles, with some aficionados preferring the Diplomaticos to the Monte. Also, if I&#039;m not wrong, the Diplomaticos 1 &amp; 3 no longer in current production. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the review, IMHO these 2 marques have different flavor profiles, with some aficionados preferring the Diplomaticos to the Monte. Also, if I&#039;m not wrong, the Diplomaticos 1 &amp; 3 no longer in current production.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cigar Inspector</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/05/05142009-stogie-reviews-diplomaticos-no-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-80566</link>
		<dc:creator>Cigar Inspector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 05:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=4795#comment-80566</guid>
		<description>Seems like my bad experience is confirmed. 
I didn&#039;t like the Diplomaticos No. 2 (as stated in my review) and it can hardly be called a value alternative to the Monte No. 2.. the difference between the two is huge. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like my bad experience is confirmed.</p>
<p>I didn&#039;t like the Diplomaticos No. 2 (as stated in my review) and it can hardly be called a value alternative to the Monte No. 2.. the difference between the two is huge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

