<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stogie Reviews: Camacho Connecticut Monarca</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/07/07272009-stogie-reviews-camacho-connecticut-monarca.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/07/07272009-stogie-reviews-camacho-connecticut-monarca.html</link>
	<description>Blowin’  Smoke on Everything Cigars - cigar reviews, news and commentary 7 days a week</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:36:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/07/07272009-stogie-reviews-camacho-connecticut-monarca.html/comment-page-1#comment-128513</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=5675#comment-128513</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve kept this cigar in my humidor since it&#039;s release. There has been rumor that Camacho did not have good quality control when releasing this cigar. Based on my experience this line has actually changes for the better over time. I would agree on some of the low reviews when I would get a &quot;bad&quot; stick in 2009 when they were released. However, each stick I light now, probably since Spring of this year, is very consistent--with the 4 out of 5 rating. Although I can&#039;t speak to someone&#039;s personal tastes, this line is worth another go if you haven&#039;t tried one, or did and it&#039;s been a while. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve kept this cigar in my humidor since it&#039;s release. There has been rumor that Camacho did not have good quality control when releasing this cigar. Based on my experience this line has actually changes for the better over time. I would agree on some of the low reviews when I would get a &quot;bad&quot; stick in 2009 when they were released. However, each stick I light now, probably since Spring of this year, is very consistent&#8211;with the 4 out of 5 rating. Although I can&#039;t speak to someone&#039;s personal tastes, this line is worth another go if you haven&#039;t tried one, or did and it&#039;s been a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vincent</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/07/07272009-stogie-reviews-camacho-connecticut-monarca.html/comment-page-1#comment-111187</link>
		<dc:creator>vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 08:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=5675#comment-111187</guid>
		<description>Really great to see other tobaccos besides Dominican paired with Connecticut wrappers. Interesting smoke. This was more earthy and mossy than the Nicaraguan Connecticuts like Oliva White. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really great to see other tobaccos besides Dominican paired with Connecticut wrappers. Interesting smoke. This was more earthy and mossy than the Nicaraguan Connecticuts like Oliva White.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: derek</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/07/07272009-stogie-reviews-camacho-connecticut-monarca.html/comment-page-1#comment-107752</link>
		<dc:creator>derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 11:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=5675#comment-107752</guid>
		<description>I smoked half of one of these and threw it out. You nailed it though when you said hints of saw dust. Why  would someone enjoy the taste of sawdust?? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I smoked half of one of these and threw it out. You nailed it though when you said hints of saw dust. Why  would someone enjoy the taste of sawdust??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stogie Commentary: Gold Star Smokes (Part IV)</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/07/07272009-stogie-reviews-camacho-connecticut-monarca.html/comment-page-1#comment-92169</link>
		<dc:creator>Stogie Commentary: Gold Star Smokes (Part IV)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=5675#comment-92169</guid>
		<description>[...] The more I smoke the Camacho Connecticut Churchill, the more I like it. Great flavor, smooth, nicely constructed—and weighing in at only $6. You’ll be hard-pressed to find a more satisfying medium- to full-strength cigar at such a reasonable price. Light one up, grab a drink, switch on the TV, and enjoy the game. (Here’s a review of the robusto-sized Monarca). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The more I smoke the Camacho Connecticut Churchill, the more I like it. Great flavor, smooth, nicely constructed—and weighing in at only $6. You’ll be hard-pressed to find a more satisfying medium- to full-strength cigar at such a reasonable price. Light one up, grab a drink, switch on the TV, and enjoy the game. (Here’s a review of the robusto-sized Monarca). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stogie Spirits: Zaya Gran Reserva 12 Year Old Rum</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/07/07272009-stogie-reviews-camacho-connecticut-monarca.html/comment-page-1#comment-88602</link>
		<dc:creator>Stogie Spirits: Zaya Gran Reserva 12 Year Old Rum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=5675#comment-88602</guid>
		<description>[...] most complementary cigars run in the mild- to medium-bodied range and lack much sweetness. Try the Camacho Connecticut, Isla de Cuba Classic, or the Cuban Crafters Cubano Claro on for size. I trust you’ll be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] most complementary cigars run in the mild- to medium-bodied range and lack much sweetness. Try the Camacho Connecticut, Isla de Cuba Classic, or the Cuban Crafters Cubano Claro on for size. I trust you’ll be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OlivaSerieV</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/07/07272009-stogie-reviews-camacho-connecticut-monarca.html/comment-page-1#comment-87074</link>
		<dc:creator>OlivaSerieV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 22:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=5675#comment-87074</guid>
		<description>Nice review.

These are some mighty tasty Connecticut wrapped cigars. The figurado shape is definitely my favorite or the line. Creamy, toasty billowing clouds of smoke. Give me one of these over a Davidoff any day of the week both my palette and my wallet love this cigar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review.</p>
<p>These are some mighty tasty Connecticut wrapped cigars. The figurado shape is definitely my favorite or the line. Creamy, toasty billowing clouds of smoke. Give me one of these over a Davidoff any day of the week both my palette and my wallet love this cigar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Dog rockets</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/07/07272009-stogie-reviews-camacho-connecticut-monarca.html/comment-page-1#comment-87054</link>
		<dc:creator>No Dog rockets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=5675#comment-87054</guid>
		<description>I have had a few and prefer them over the Oliva Connecticut.
I think Camacho has a winner:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had a few and prefer them over the Oliva Connecticut.<br />
I think Camacho has a winner:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ROTHNH</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/07/07272009-stogie-reviews-camacho-connecticut-monarca.html/comment-page-1#comment-87062</link>
		<dc:creator>ROTHNH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=5675#comment-87062</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll have to try this one.  So far, the H. Upmann Signature Monarca is the best of this genre but getting harder to find. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ll have to try this one.  So far, the H. Upmann Signature Monarca is the best of this genre but getting harder to find.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmjones</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/07/07272009-stogie-reviews-camacho-connecticut-monarca.html/comment-page-1#comment-87053</link>
		<dc:creator>dmjones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=5675#comment-87053</guid>
		<description>While not being a big fan of most other Camachos on the market, I was thoroughly impressed by this milder offering from them. It is on the mild side and yet still is very flavorful and the price point is truly surprising for Camacho. 
 
I would rank it in the top 3 mild smokes on the market along with the Oliva Connecticut and Nub Connecticut (all of which tend to be on the mild-to-medium side of mild). All 3 of these cigars offer wonderful flavors in a mild smoke for a price that is a fraction of what you would pay for something like a Davidoff or AVO. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While not being a big fan of most other Camachos on the market, I was thoroughly impressed by this milder offering from them. It is on the mild side and yet still is very flavorful and the price point is truly surprising for Camacho.</p>
<p>I would rank it in the top 3 mild smokes on the market along with the Oliva Connecticut and Nub Connecticut (all of which tend to be on the mild-to-medium side of mild). All 3 of these cigars offer wonderful flavors in a mild smoke for a price that is a fraction of what you would pay for something like a Davidoff or AVO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

