<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stogie Commentary: Protecting Our Cigars from the FDA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/10/10272009-protecting-cigars-from-fda.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/10/10272009-protecting-cigars-from-fda.html</link>
	<description>Blowin’  Smoke on Everything Cigars - cigar reviews, news and commentary 7 days a week</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:25:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stogie News: FDA Rules on Cigars Due Soon</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/10/10272009-protecting-cigars-from-fda.html/comment-page-1#comment-116335</link>
		<dc:creator>Stogie News: FDA Rules on Cigars Due Soon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=6725#comment-116335</guid>
		<description>[...] know it has been said before, but FDA regulation of cigars is on the way. On April 26 the FDA published a notice in the Federal [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] know it has been said before, but FDA regulation of cigars is on the way. On April 26 the FDA published a notice in the Federal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stogie News: FDA Tobacco Committee Faces Ethics Questions</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/10/10272009-protecting-cigars-from-fda.html/comment-page-1#comment-112008</link>
		<dc:creator>Stogie News: FDA Tobacco Committee Faces Ethics Questions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=6725#comment-112008</guid>
		<description>[...] The TPSAC was created under the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act which puts tobacco products under FDA oversight. Last Fall the FDA sought comments on expanding its authority to include cigars. A recommendation by the TPSAC would be the likely first step towards regulation towards cigars, which would be extremely damaging for the cigar industry and the choices of cigar smokers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The TPSAC was created under the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act which puts tobacco products under FDA oversight. Last Fall the FDA sought comments on expanding its authority to include cigars. A recommendation by the TPSAC would be the likely first step towards regulation towards cigars, which would be extremely damaging for the cigar industry and the choices of cigar smokers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UberZero</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/10/10272009-protecting-cigars-from-fda.html/comment-page-1#comment-106689</link>
		<dc:creator>UberZero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=6725#comment-106689</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re here... FDA filed this week its intent to include cigars under its authority.  
search for &quot;CIGARS SUBJECT TO THE FAMILY SMOKING PREVENTION  
AND TOBACCO CONTROL ACT&quot; in 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://frwebgate3.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/TEXTgate.cgi?WAISdocID=65946218723+9+1+0&amp;WAISaction=retrieve&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://frwebgate3.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/TEXTgate...&lt;/a&gt;  
 
It reads:  
 
&quot;Legal Authority: 21 USC 301 et seq, The Federal Food, Drug, and  
Cosmetic Act; PL 111-31, The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco  
Control Act 
 
Abstract: The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (the  
Tobacco Control Act) provides FDA authority to regulate cigarettes,  
cigarette tobacco, roll-your-own tobacco, and smokeless tobacco.  
Section 901 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended by  
the Tobacco Control Act, permits FDA to issue regulations deeming other  
tobacco products to be subject to the Tobacco Control Act. This  
proposed rule would deem cigars to be subject to the Tobacco Control  
Act and include provisions to address public health concerns raised by  
cigars.&quot; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#039;re here&#8230; FDA filed this week its intent to include cigars under its authority. </p>
<p>search for &quot;CIGARS SUBJECT TO THE FAMILY SMOKING PREVENTION </p>
<p>AND TOBACCO CONTROL ACT&quot; in</p>
<p>  <a href="http://frwebgate3.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/TEXTgate.cgi?WAISdocID=65946218723+9+1+0&amp;WAISaction=retrieve" rel="nofollow">http://frwebgate3.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/TEXTgate&#8230;</a>  </p>
<p>It reads: </p>
<p>&quot;Legal Authority: 21 USC 301 et seq, The Federal Food, Drug, and </p>
<p>Cosmetic Act; PL 111-31, The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco </p>
<p>Control Act</p>
<p>Abstract: The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (the </p>
<p>Tobacco Control Act) provides FDA authority to regulate cigarettes, </p>
<p>cigarette tobacco, roll-your-own tobacco, and smokeless tobacco. </p>
<p>Section 901 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended by </p>
<p>the Tobacco Control Act, permits FDA to issue regulations deeming other </p>
<p>tobacco products to be subject to the Tobacco Control Act. This </p>
<p>proposed rule would deem cigars to be subject to the Tobacco Control </p>
<p>Act and include provisions to address public health concerns raised by </p>
<p>cigars.&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stogie Guys Friday Sampler CLXXXVII</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/10/10272009-protecting-cigars-from-fda.html/comment-page-1#comment-106567</link>
		<dc:creator>Stogie Guys Friday Sampler CLXXXVII</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 08:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=6725#comment-106567</guid>
		<description>[...] signed the “Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act” last summer, many viewed the FDA’s newfound authority over tobacco as a cigarette issue. The law, after all, doesn’t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] signed the “Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act” last summer, many viewed the FDA’s newfound authority over tobacco as a cigarette issue. The law, after all, doesn’t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stogie Guys Friday Sampler CLXXIII</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/10/10272009-protecting-cigars-from-fda.html/comment-page-1#comment-97721</link>
		<dc:creator>Stogie Guys Friday Sampler CLXXIII</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 08:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=6725#comment-97721</guid>
		<description>[...] tobacco as a cigarette issue, cigar makers, retailers, and consumers have started to recognize the immediate threat the bureaucracy&#8217;s oversight poses to premium [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tobacco as a cigarette issue, cigar makers, retailers, and consumers have started to recognize the immediate threat the bureaucracy&#8217;s oversight poses to premium [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Mowers</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/10/10272009-protecting-cigars-from-fda.html/comment-page-1#comment-93113</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Mowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=6725#comment-93113</guid>
		<description>Today the FDA banned carbonated alcohol drinks due to an alarming rise in teenager alcohol abuse. They found the carton packaging on the cans along with names like, Purple Unicorn to psychologically designed to appeal to younger users of the powerful drug. Further research that was performed in convenience stores across America showed at least a cursory connection to marijuana blunt smoking and crack cocaine use increase when high-powered 40 and 50 ounce carbonated alcoholic can drinks were offered for sale in low-income neighborhoods. These neighborhoods are the same ones your children may live in, further more the same study produced evidence that teenagers did in fact live within two miles of more than 78% of the stores where alcoholic intoxicants were marketed to young people. 
 
Judith Denko, a high school senior at Sanderson High School in Raleigh stated, &quot;I became an alcoholic by the time I was in sixth grade, the corner store sold what I thought were sodas and they turned out to be alcohol drinks. After I began using drugs the combination nearly ruined my life, my grades went down, I had risky sexual behaviors leading to health problems..and that is when I was approached by some guys at a hardware store about inhalants. I got hooked on high alcohol content flavored sodas and spray paint...my teeth there ruined, just like my life&quot; 
 
Her heart-felt testimony before a Congressional committee, brought many members to tears as she showed the x rays of what doctors now say is permanent liver damage. &quot;I just wanted to fit in&quot; said M.s Denko &quot;Flavored, carbonated alcohol drinks stole my life before i could really live it.&quot; 
 
America, your children&#039;s lives are at stake. Ban flavored alcohol drinks and pastel colored spray paint cans. Judy might be your little girl some day. We have done in the candy flavored cigarettes for preschoolers, let&#039;s finished the job and ban tasty alcohol while we have a Democratic majority willing to inhibit personal freedom for special interest. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today the FDA banned carbonated alcohol drinks due to an alarming rise in teenager alcohol abuse. They found the carton packaging on the cans along with names like, Purple Unicorn to psychologically designed to appeal to younger users of the powerful drug. Further research that was performed in convenience stores across America showed at least a cursory connection to marijuana blunt smoking and crack cocaine use increase when high-powered 40 and 50 ounce carbonated alcoholic can drinks were offered for sale in low-income neighborhoods. These neighborhoods are the same ones your children may live in, further more the same study produced evidence that teenagers did in fact live within two miles of more than 78% of the stores where alcoholic intoxicants were marketed to young people.</p>
<p>Judith Denko, a high school senior at Sanderson High School in Raleigh stated, &quot;I became an alcoholic by the time I was in sixth grade, the corner store sold what I thought were sodas and they turned out to be alcohol drinks. After I began using drugs the combination nearly ruined my life, my grades went down, I had risky sexual behaviors leading to health problems..and that is when I was approached by some guys at a hardware store about inhalants. I got hooked on high alcohol content flavored sodas and spray paint&#8230;my teeth there ruined, just like my life&quot;</p>
<p>Her heart-felt testimony before a Congressional committee, brought many members to tears as she showed the x rays of what doctors now say is permanent liver damage. &quot;I just wanted to fit in&quot; said M.s Denko &quot;Flavored, carbonated alcohol drinks stole my life before i could really live it.&quot;</p>
<p>America, your children&#039;s lives are at stake. Ban flavored alcohol drinks and pastel colored spray paint cans. Judy might be your little girl some day. We have done in the candy flavored cigarettes for preschoolers, let&#039;s finished the job and ban tasty alcohol while we have a Democratic majority willing to inhibit personal freedom for special interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George E.</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/10/10272009-protecting-cigars-from-fda.html/comment-page-1#comment-92886</link>
		<dc:creator>George E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=6725#comment-92886</guid>
		<description>The Wall Street Journal today (10/27) had one of its top writers weigh in with an interesting report on the controversy over the FDA and clove cigarettes/cigars. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Wall Street Journal today (10/27) had one of its top writers weigh in with an interesting report on the controversy over the FDA and clove cigarettes/cigars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/10/10272009-protecting-cigars-from-fda.html/comment-page-1#comment-92865</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=6725#comment-92865</guid>
		<description>And here is what the FDA&#039;s Web site still says about cigars. I think any cigar regulations, even if the FDA decided to fast-track them, would be delayed for at least a couple years by rulemaking and lawsuits over this issue: 
 
Are cigars impacted by the passage of the Act?  
 
Cigars are considered tobacco products under the FSPTCA. However, the Act does not automatically apply to cigars. FDA must issue a regulation deeming cigars to be subject to the law. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And here is what the FDA&#039;s Web site still says about cigars. I think any cigar regulations, even if the FDA decided to fast-track them, would be delayed for at least a couple years by rulemaking and lawsuits over this issue:</p>
<p>Are cigars impacted by the passage of the Act? </p>
<p>Cigars are considered tobacco products under the FSPTCA. However, the Act does not automatically apply to cigars. FDA must issue a regulation deeming cigars to be subject to the law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/10/10272009-protecting-cigars-from-fda.html/comment-page-1#comment-92863</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=6725#comment-92863</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised CA didn&#039;t put that news in their regular magazine or at least online. I guess I could see some of the large, handmade flavored cigars by companies like CAO coming under scrutiny.  
 
While I suppose heavy FDA regs for cigars are possible, I still doubt it. Canada has had regulations simalar to the FDA&#039;s new powers for two decades and cigars are still sold there and at least as far as nonflavored cigars, exempt from many of the rules governing cigarettes.  
 
And when you consider that most handmade cigars are made outside the US, that further complicates US efforts to impose its manufacturing standards.  
 
Finally, I think it&#039;s a question of resources. Dealing with cigars are not a good use of the FDA&#039;s manpower.  
 
Thanks for the info, Patrick. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m surprised CA didn&#039;t put that news in their regular magazine or at least online. I guess I could see some of the large, handmade flavored cigars by companies like CAO coming under scrutiny. </p>
<p>While I suppose heavy FDA regs for cigars are possible, I still doubt it. Canada has had regulations simalar to the FDA&#039;s new powers for two decades and cigars are still sold there and at least as far as nonflavored cigars, exempt from many of the rules governing cigarettes. </p>
<p>And when you consider that most handmade cigars are made outside the US, that further complicates US efforts to impose its manufacturing standards. </p>
<p>Finally, I think it&#039;s a question of resources. Dealing with cigars are not a good use of the FDA&#039;s manpower. </p>
<p>Thanks for the info, Patrick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mighty</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/10/10272009-protecting-cigars-from-fda.html/comment-page-1#comment-92859</link>
		<dc:creator>mighty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=6725#comment-92859</guid>
		<description>A picture that I like to use to differentiate between cigars and cigarettes is the difference between a BB gun and a 9mm.  Sure, both are &quot;guns,&quot; but they are in totally separate classes of regulations, rules, etc. 
 
Sure, both cigarettes and cigars are both tobacco (or guns from my example) but as we know, and what we need to get the word out on is that they are totally different from each other, just like the BB and 9mm are.  People smoke cigarettes for a fix, where many people smoke cigars for the good company, relaxing atmosphere, nuances in flavors, and much more.  I dont get into nicotine withdrawal if I dont get to have my occasional cigar. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A picture that I like to use to differentiate between cigars and cigarettes is the difference between a BB gun and a 9mm.  Sure, both are &quot;guns,&quot; but they are in totally separate classes of regulations, rules, etc.</p>
<p>Sure, both cigarettes and cigars are both tobacco (or guns from my example) but as we know, and what we need to get the word out on is that they are totally different from each other, just like the BB and 9mm are.  People smoke cigarettes for a fix, where many people smoke cigars for the good company, relaxing atmosphere, nuances in flavors, and much more.  I dont get into nicotine withdrawal if I dont get to have my occasional cigar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

