<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stogie Guys Friday Sampler CLXX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/12/12042009-stogie-guys-friday-sampler-clxx.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/12/12042009-stogie-guys-friday-sampler-clxx.html</link>
	<description>Blowin’  Smoke on Everything Cigars - cigar reviews, news and commentary 7 days a week</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:25:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Ferreira</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/12/12042009-stogie-guys-friday-sampler-clxx.html/comment-page-1#comment-95405</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Ferreira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 13:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=7222#comment-95405</guid>
		<description>Apparently, when the new and improved blends of certain cigars release date was said to be November, guess they meant Nov. of next year. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, when the new and improved blends of certain cigars release date was said to be November, guess they meant Nov. of next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Stogie Guys</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/12/12042009-stogie-guys-friday-sampler-clxx.html/comment-page-1#comment-95368</link>
		<dc:creator>The Stogie Guys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 19:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=7222#comment-95368</guid>
		<description>JoshK-
You are indeed correct. Thanks, the post has been updated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JoshK-<br />
You are indeed correct. Thanks, the post has been updated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoshK</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/12/12042009-stogie-guys-friday-sampler-clxx.html/comment-page-1#comment-95359</link>
		<dc:creator>JoshK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 19:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=7222#comment-95359</guid>
		<description>I thought the DPG event at Cigar Inn was next Saturday (the 12th). 


I also enjoy text reviews more than videos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the DPG event at Cigar Inn was next Saturday (the 12th). </p>
<p>I also enjoy text reviews more than videos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winford9</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/12/12042009-stogie-guys-friday-sampler-clxx.html/comment-page-1#comment-95349</link>
		<dc:creator>Winford9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=7222#comment-95349</guid>
		<description>Amen, Dave. A-fucking-men. 

Watching some uncharismatic guy smoke a cigar for 20 minutes is slow torture. I know videos are big, but something like a cigar review is so much better suited to the written word.

I think the video review phenomenon (if you can call it that) is somewhat of a product of laziness. Laziness on the part of those who make them, who can’t be bothered to script anything out or put together a string of decent sentences. And laziness on the part of those who watch them, who can’t be bothered to read.

To each his own. I&#039;m glad there&#039;s variety when it comes to cigar websites, and I&#039;m glad for StogieGuys.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen, Dave. A-fucking-men. </p>
<p>Watching some uncharismatic guy smoke a cigar for 20 minutes is slow torture. I know videos are big, but something like a cigar review is so much better suited to the written word.</p>
<p>I think the video review phenomenon (if you can call it that) is somewhat of a product of laziness. Laziness on the part of those who make them, who can’t be bothered to script anything out or put together a string of decent sentences. And laziness on the part of those who watch them, who can’t be bothered to read.</p>
<p>To each his own. I&#8217;m glad there&#8217;s variety when it comes to cigar websites, and I&#8217;m glad for StogieGuys.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2009/12/12042009-stogie-guys-friday-sampler-clxx.html/comment-page-1#comment-95347</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=7222#comment-95347</guid>
		<description>I like these Friday samplers, and even more so I like the format here.  Am I the only one who doesn&#039;t appreciate this growing trend of video reviews?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like these Friday samplers, and even more so I like the format here.  Am I the only one who doesn&#8217;t appreciate this growing trend of video reviews?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

