<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stogie Reviews: San Cristobal Selección del Sol Robusto</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogieguys.com/2010/01/01072010-stogie-reviews-san-cristobal-seleccion-del-sol-robusto.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2010/01/01072010-stogie-reviews-san-cristobal-seleccion-del-sol-robusto.html</link>
	<description>Blowin’  Smoke on Everything Cigars - cigar reviews, news and commentary 7 days a week</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:36:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2010/01/01072010-stogie-reviews-san-cristobal-seleccion-del-sol-robusto.html/comment-page-1#comment-169472</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=7513#comment-169472</guid>
		<description>I just had one of these. As this was a new brand for me , and not even aware it was a Ashton until research after the smoke. I quite enjoyed it and agree, this would be a mild enough cigar with a morning coffee. Nice ash, burned evenly and did not get to overpowering at the end. Overall, I will look for more. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just had one of these. As this was a new brand for me , and not even aware it was a Ashton until research after the smoke. I quite enjoyed it and agree, this would be a mild enough cigar with a morning coffee. Nice ash, burned evenly and did not get to overpowering at the end. Overall, I will look for more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick A</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2010/01/01072010-stogie-reviews-san-cristobal-seleccion-del-sol-robusto.html/comment-page-1#comment-97685</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=7513#comment-97685</guid>
		<description>I, too, have noticed some negative reviews since I posted this (I try not to read other reviews before I make up my own mind). And I can certainly see how fans of the original San Cristobal would be disappointed if they expected something similar. 
 
But I think the Selecci&#243;n del Sol is excellent in its own right, especially as a morning smoke with a cup of coffee. And, while others seemed to encounter sub-par combustion qualities, I found excellent construction across my three samples. 
 
So I&#039;d encourage those of you who have tried this blend to reconsider it; and those of you who haven&#039;t to at least sample a few. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, too, have noticed some negative reviews since I posted this (I try not to read other reviews before I make up my own mind). And I can certainly see how fans of the original San Cristobal would be disappointed if they expected something similar.</p>
<p>But I think the Selecci&oacute;n del Sol is excellent in its own right, especially as a morning smoke with a cup of coffee. And, while others seemed to encounter sub-par combustion qualities, I found excellent construction across my three samples.</p>
<p>So I&#039;d encourage those of you who have tried this blend to reconsider it; and those of you who haven&#039;t to at least sample a few.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: megathunderchief</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2010/01/01072010-stogie-reviews-san-cristobal-seleccion-del-sol-robusto.html/comment-page-1#comment-97679</link>
		<dc:creator>megathunderchief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=7513#comment-97679</guid>
		<description>I second dmjones comment on these.  I&#039;ve always been a fan fo the regular San Cristobal&#039;s bold profile, and was a little put off by the Seleccion&#039;s lack of similarity in many aspects.  This review is one of the more generous I&#039;ve read, but hey, to each their own. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second dmjones comment on these.  I&#039;ve always been a fan fo the regular San Cristobal&#039;s bold profile, and was a little put off by the Seleccion&#039;s lack of similarity in many aspects.  This review is one of the more generous I&#039;ve read, but hey, to each their own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmjones</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2010/01/01072010-stogie-reviews-san-cristobal-seleccion-del-sol-robusto.html/comment-page-1#comment-97674</link>
		<dc:creator>dmjones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 08:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=7513#comment-97674</guid>
		<description>I, too, was surprised at the lack of boldness in this cigar. I had smoked a regular San Cristobal a few days before I had the Seleccion del Sol and found this cigar wanting in comparison. However, I have one or two more of these in my humidor, so I&#039;ll definitely give it a second try, keeping in mind that it&#039;s not supposed to be like the regular version. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, too, was surprised at the lack of boldness in this cigar. I had smoked a regular San Cristobal a few days before I had the Seleccion del Sol and found this cigar wanting in comparison. However, I have one or two more of these in my humidor, so I&#039;ll definitely give it a second try, keeping in mind that it&#039;s not supposed to be like the regular version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

