<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stogie Reviews: A. Fuente Rosado Sungrown Magnum R 52</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogieguys.com/2010/01/01112010-stogie-reviews-arturo-fuente-rosado-sungrown-magnum-r-52.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2010/01/01112010-stogie-reviews-arturo-fuente-rosado-sungrown-magnum-r-52.html</link>
	<description>Blowin’  Smoke on Everything Cigars - cigar reviews, news and commentary 7 days a week</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:36:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arturo Fuente Magnum R &#124; Cigar Porn</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2010/01/01112010-stogie-reviews-arturo-fuente-rosado-sungrown-magnum-r-52.html/comment-page-1#comment-171821</link>
		<dc:creator>Arturo Fuente Magnum R &#124; Cigar Porn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 04:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=7498#comment-171821</guid>
		<description>[...] StogieReview acigarsmoker.com StogieGuys [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] StogieReview acigarsmoker.com StogieGuys [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Site News: Five Most Popular Articles of 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2010/01/01112010-stogie-reviews-arturo-fuente-rosado-sungrown-magnum-r-52.html/comment-page-1#comment-165808</link>
		<dc:creator>Site News: Five Most Popular Articles of 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=7498#comment-165808</guid>
		<description>[...] 5. Stogie Reviews: Arturo Fuente Rosado Sungrown Magnum R 52 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 5. Stogie Reviews: Arturo Fuente Rosado Sungrown Magnum R 52 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Sandoval</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2010/01/01112010-stogie-reviews-arturo-fuente-rosado-sungrown-magnum-r-52.html/comment-page-1#comment-115992</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Sandoval</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=7498#comment-115992</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m smoking one of these right now, probably my 10th one or so to try.  I really like these Rosados alot.  They are lighter in character but very rich in taste and a very approachable cigar for those that don&#039;t smoke that often, something I can share with friends and not have to worry about it.  While I enjoy OpusX and Hemingways quite a bit, these R52&#039;s are definatey a keeper and will always be in my humidor.  I just wish they would make them a tad smaller.  A 44 Magnum would be a dream smoke for me! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m smoking one of these right now, probably my 10th one or so to try.  I really like these Rosados alot.  They are lighter in character but very rich in taste and a very approachable cigar for those that don&#039;t smoke that often, something I can share with friends and not have to worry about it.  While I enjoy OpusX and Hemingways quite a bit, these R52&#039;s are definatey a keeper and will always be in my humidor.  I just wish they would make them a tad smaller.  A 44 Magnum would be a dream smoke for me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Pitts</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2010/01/01112010-stogie-reviews-arturo-fuente-rosado-sungrown-magnum-r-52.html/comment-page-1#comment-103015</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Pitts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=7498#comment-103015</guid>
		<description>I just purchased a box of R54s. I am in love with the Rosado wrapper, the taste being great. But, I, too, have had 2 sticks from that box begin to unravel about half-way through the stick. Something is definitely going on with these 10-yr old wrappers. Not up to Fuente&#039;s construction standards. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just purchased a box of R54s. I am in love with the Rosado wrapper, the taste being great. But, I, too, have had 2 sticks from that box begin to unravel about half-way through the stick. Something is definitely going on with these 10-yr old wrappers. Not up to Fuente&#039;s construction standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SmartAsh</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2010/01/01112010-stogie-reviews-arturo-fuente-rosado-sungrown-magnum-r-52.html/comment-page-1#comment-98934</link>
		<dc:creator>SmartAsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 01:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=7498#comment-98934</guid>
		<description>Strictly speaking, a heavy hand with the band glue that causes the wrapper to tear when attempting to remove a band is not a construction problem; it&#039;s annoying, and combined with the wayward glue smeared elsewhere on the cigar, a sign of lax QC for sure... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strictly speaking, a heavy hand with the band glue that causes the wrapper to tear when attempting to remove a band is not a construction problem; it&#039;s annoying, and combined with the wayward glue smeared elsewhere on the cigar, a sign of lax QC for sure&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmjones</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2010/01/01112010-stogie-reviews-arturo-fuente-rosado-sungrown-magnum-r-52.html/comment-page-1#comment-97896</link>
		<dc:creator>dmjones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=7498#comment-97896</guid>
		<description>Good point on the humi pack. When I try these again, I&#039;m going to make sure I smoke it right there in the store and if there&#039;s a problem I can address it with whoever&#039;s working. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point on the humi pack. When I try these again, I&#039;m going to make sure I smoke it right there in the store and if there&#039;s a problem I can address it with whoever&#039;s working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cj</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2010/01/01112010-stogie-reviews-arturo-fuente-rosado-sungrown-magnum-r-52.html/comment-page-1#comment-97892</link>
		<dc:creator>cj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=7498#comment-97892</guid>
		<description>I know most Fuente boxes ship with a humi pack as well.  Dried out is a BS know nothing excuse from a B&amp;M!  I liked the Queen B I smoked, have not seen these yet. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know most Fuente boxes ship with a humi pack as well.  Dried out is a BS know nothing excuse from a B&amp;M!  I liked the Queen B I smoked, have not seen these yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmjones</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2010/01/01112010-stogie-reviews-arturo-fuente-rosado-sungrown-magnum-r-52.html/comment-page-1#comment-97891</link>
		<dc:creator>dmjones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=7498#comment-97891</guid>
		<description>I smoked an R52 and an R56. I found the R52 to be overall better-tasting than the R56, but I had major construction issues with both. Starting with the extra glue smeared on the wrapper that you saw, I also had the wrapper crack on one cigar when I cut it, plus the band took off a large chunk when I removed it. On the second stick, it started canoeing about half an inch in and got worse as it progressed. It never would go straight...and the band took off a chunk of wrapper on that one, too. 
 
I know, I know...hand-made products...mistakes happen...etc, etc, etc. But to pick two sticks from two boxes and both have construction problems that prevent the full enjoyment of said cigars? Disappointing. From a company like Fuente? Inexcusable. 
 
I talked to the manager at my local B&amp;M and he said I bought them the day they came in, so they might have been a little dried out. Also not much of an excuse since I had them in my own humi for a week or more before smoking them and no other sticks have any signs of drying. 
 
That all being said, I did like the flavor of the R52 and would like to try it again...maybe from a different box or batch. I think the wrappers on these are ultra-thin and super-delicate, so something to watch out for. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I smoked an R52 and an R56. I found the R52 to be overall better-tasting than the R56, but I had major construction issues with both. Starting with the extra glue smeared on the wrapper that you saw, I also had the wrapper crack on one cigar when I cut it, plus the band took off a large chunk when I removed it. On the second stick, it started canoeing about half an inch in and got worse as it progressed. It never would go straight&#8230;and the band took off a chunk of wrapper on that one, too.</p>
<p>I know, I know&#8230;hand-made products&#8230;mistakes happen&#8230;etc, etc, etc. But to pick two sticks from two boxes and both have construction problems that prevent the full enjoyment of said cigars? Disappointing. From a company like Fuente? Inexcusable.</p>
<p>I talked to the manager at my local B&amp;M and he said I bought them the day they came in, so they might have been a little dried out. Also not much of an excuse since I had them in my own humi for a week or more before smoking them and no other sticks have any signs of drying.</p>
<p>That all being said, I did like the flavor of the R52 and would like to try it again&#8230;maybe from a different box or batch. I think the wrappers on these are ultra-thin and super-delicate, so something to watch out for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

