<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stogie Guys Friday Sampler CLXXVII</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogieguys.com/2010/02/02192010-stogie-guys-friday-sampler-clxxvii.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2010/02/02192010-stogie-guys-friday-sampler-clxxvii.html</link>
	<description>Blowin’  Smoke on Everything Cigars - cigar reviews, news and commentary 7 days a week</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:25:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lowpro75</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2010/02/02192010-stogie-guys-friday-sampler-clxxvii.html/comment-page-1#comment-100842</link>
		<dc:creator>lowpro75</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=8072#comment-100842</guid>
		<description>No problem.  Thanks for clearing it up and correcting the link. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem.  Thanks for clearing it up and correcting the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick A</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2010/02/02192010-stogie-guys-friday-sampler-clxxvii.html/comment-page-1#comment-100798</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=8072#comment-100798</guid>
		<description>This is my fault. When I originally posted this Sampler I linked to the wrong article, which was from Feb. 09. It has now been updated. Sorry for the confusion. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is my fault. When I originally posted this Sampler I linked to the wrong article, which was from Feb. 09. It has now been updated. Sorry for the confusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lowpro75</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2010/02/02192010-stogie-guys-friday-sampler-clxxvii.html/comment-page-1#comment-100787</link>
		<dc:creator>lowpro75</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=8072#comment-100787</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s strange.  When I originally clicked on the link I got this article:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pottsmerc.com/articles/2009/02/18/business/srv0000004707516.txt&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.pottsmerc.com/articles/2009/02/18/busi...&lt;/a&gt;  
 
from 09.  It&#039;s actually the source of that Keith Meirers quote as well. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s strange.  When I originally clicked on the link I got this article:  <a href="http://www.pottsmerc.com/articles/2009/02/18/business/srv0000004707516.txt" rel="nofollow">http://www.pottsmerc.com/articles/2009/02/18/busi&#8230;</a>  </p>
<p>from 09.  It&#039;s actually the source of that Keith Meirers quote as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George E</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2010/02/02192010-stogie-guys-friday-sampler-clxxvii.html/comment-page-1#comment-100748</link>
		<dc:creator>George E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=8072#comment-100748</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure what you&#039;re referring to, but numerous articles such as this one in the Philadelphia Inquirer,  &lt;a href=&quot;http://(http://www.philly.com/philly/business/homepage/20100209_Rendell_budget_plan__Shave_sales_tax__widen_its_scope.html)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;(http://www.philly.com/philly/business/homepage/20100209_Rendell_budget_plan__Shave_sales_tax__widen_its_scope.html)&lt;/a&gt; state that a cigar tax is part of the governor&#039;s budget proposal for 2010. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m not sure what you&#039;re referring to, but numerous articles such as this one in the Philadelphia Inquirer,  <a href="http://(http://www.philly.com/philly/business/homepage/20100209_Rendell_budget_plan__Shave_sales_tax__widen_its_scope.html)" rel="nofollow">(</a><a href="http://www.philly.com/philly/business/homepage/20100209_Rendell_budget_plan__Shave_sales_tax__widen_its_scope.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.philly.com/philly/business/homepage/20100209_Rendell_budget_plan__Shave_sales_tax__widen_its_scope.html</a>) state that a cigar tax is part of the governor&#039;s budget proposal for 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lowpro75</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2010/02/02192010-stogie-guys-friday-sampler-clxxvii.html/comment-page-1#comment-100743</link>
		<dc:creator>lowpro75</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 09:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=8072#comment-100743</guid>
		<description>The cigar tax article is from last year (Feb 2009).  The tax was defeated (for now) in the final budget proposal.  In fact, according to cigarcyclopedia.com, CI plans to expand in PA.  Here is the link.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cigarcyclopedia.com/webapp/content/view/1650/27/1/1/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cigarcyclopedia.com/webapp/content/vie...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cigar tax article is from last year (Feb 2009).  The tax was defeated (for now) in the final budget proposal.  In fact, according to cigarcyclopedia.com, CI plans to expand in PA.  Here is the link.<br />
  <a href="http://www.cigarcyclopedia.com/webapp/content/view/1650/27/1/1/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cigarcyclopedia.com/webapp/content/vie&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

