<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stogie Commentary: High Fives of 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stogieguys.com/2010/03/03032010-stogie-commentary-high-fives-of-2009.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2010/03/03032010-stogie-commentary-high-fives-of-2009.html</link>
	<description>Blowin’  Smoke on Everything Cigars - cigar reviews, news and commentary 7 days a week</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:25:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stogie Commentary: Perfect Fives of 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2010/03/03032010-stogie-commentary-high-fives-of-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-171178</link>
		<dc:creator>Stogie Commentary: Perfect Fives of 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 13:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=8212#comment-171178</guid>
		<description>[...] thought it was time to round up the top-rated cigars from 2010. You can catch up on previous years here and here. Going through the Stogie Guys Review Archive, I found four fives in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] thought it was time to round up the top-rated cigars from 2010. You can catch up on previous years here and here. Going through the Stogie Guys Review Archive, I found four fives in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan Kurland</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2010/03/03032010-stogie-commentary-high-fives-of-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-101499</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan Kurland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 05:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=8212#comment-101499</guid>
		<description>George E, I think it is fine that you did not rate any cigar a full five-cigar score.  If that is how the year went, no need to worry about it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George E, I think it is fine that you did not rate any cigar a full five-cigar score.  If that is how the year went, no need to worry about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2010/03/03032010-stogie-commentary-high-fives-of-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-101473</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=8212#comment-101473</guid>
		<description>All great smokes and worthy of your highest ratings. The OpusX No 2 and LG Diez are two of my favorites. 
 
And I&#039;d really like to try a 18 year old PG sometime. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All great smokes and worthy of your highest ratings. The OpusX No 2 and LG Diez are two of my favorites.</p>
<p>And I&#039;d really like to try a 18 year old PG sometime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Padronnie</title>
		<link>http://www.stogieguys.com/2010/03/03032010-stogie-commentary-high-fives-of-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-101462</link>
		<dc:creator>Padronnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stogieguys.com/?p=8212#comment-101462</guid>
		<description>Great Smokes... wish I could get my hands on that Montecristo LE that Sublime size can be fantastic when well done. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Smokes&#8230; wish I could get my hands on that Montecristo LE that Sublime size can be fantastic when well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

