Stogie Guys Free Newsletter

Subscribe today for a chance to win great cigar prizes:

Presented by:

Stogie Commentary: Senseless Fascism

30 May 2006

In an article in today’s Wall Street Journal, Calabasas, California city officials are lauding their draconian law which prohibits all smoking outdoors, except in city-approved designated “smoking areas.” In effect, the city government has laid claim to and commandeered the air, preventing adults from exercising their individual rights to free choice.

Most reasonable people observing the Calabasas calamity from the outside agree that outdoor smoking bans go way too far. No scientific or medical data have ever even suggested that banning smoking outdoors reduces exposure to second-hand smoke.

Which brings us to the unfortunate heart of this controversial issue: If Calabasas officials aren’t trying to “protect” nonsmokers, they must be trying to “protect” smokers, the very people who are consciously choosing to smoke. That shouldn’t come as a surprise. After all, the aim of every smoking ban – whether outdoors or inside private buildings – is for the government to control the actions of consenting adults.

But what about the waitresses and bartenders who work in smoking facilities? What about all the nonsmokers who frequent these businesses? Aren’t smoking bans intended to protect these people from second-hand smoke?

First of all, the notion of second-hand smoke as an epidemic is totally overblown. While the AFL-CIO claims in a press release that “second-hand smoke is estimated to cause 65,000 deaths per year in the U.S.,” that number is just plain wrong. It’s 20 times the estimate of the Center for Disease Control, and even the CDC estimate was roundly rejected by a federal court.

Second, since public health isn’t really a factor, most nonsmokers who support smoking bans in private businesses do so because they don’t like the smell – not because they’re concerned for their health. “It gets in my hair,” they whine. Well, guess what? This is America. No one – I mean no one – has the right to ban the actions of others simply because they’re annoyed. That’s certainly not a principle America’s founding generation fought and died for.

What these aggravating gripers do have is the right to take their business elsewhere. As in any case in public policy, free markets – not government bans and regulations on private businesses – work perfectly. If there is a demand for smoke-free facilities, smart entrepreneurs will rise to the occasion. In fact, here’s a list of literally hundreds of nonsmoking facilities in my hometown provided by Smoke Free DC, the idiot group that squelched individual free choice in – of all places – our nation’s capital.

Finally, any waitress, bartender, or busboy who works in a smoking facility knew well in advance of his or her first day that customers’ smoke would come with the territory. If they’re so bothered by second-hand smoke, there’s plenty of other jobs out there to consider.

The bottom line is that consenting adults have rights to do with their bodies what they so please, and private business owners have rights to offer the accommodations they so choose. Whatever the perceived social ill, government regulation and intervention is almost certainly a “cure” worse than the disease.

-Patrick A


Drew Estate

44 Responses to “Stogie Commentary: Senseless Fascism”

  1. Anonymous Tuesday, May 30, 2006 at 4:52 pm #

    I think you guys need to rethink the "purpose" of your sight. As an average joe smoker I'm having a hard time identifying with your blog. Maybe its not meant for the "average joe smoker" but more for your crowd. Have either of you guys ever worked in the service industry or are you two just use to being served?

  2. Proud Smoker Tuesday, October 3, 2006 at 7:40 am #

    Nice ad hominem attack anonymous!

    Why deal with the substance of an argument when you can attack the messenger.

  3. Randy Wednesday, November 8, 2006 at 12:38 pm #

    I think the first guy needs to rethink the purpose of his face.

  4. dizionario Thursday, February 22, 2007 at 11:06 am #

    Nice site you have!

  5. uomo Monday, February 26, 2007 at 2:48 am #

    The information I found here was rather helpful. Thank you for this.

  6. napoli Tuesday, March 13, 2007 at 2:05 am #

    E evidente che il luogo e stato fatto dalla persona che realmente conosce il mestiere!

  7. Unknown Tuesday, April 24, 2007 at 10:14 am #

    I totally agree with you. People are just complainers and they need to deal with everyone else. So, what is next to take away, water? I wouldn't be shocked if farting in public was illegal next because people didn't want to smell like human waste. What about farms? Animals stink…? I'm confused by the people that want this ban! Busninesses are losing money and having to close…why did they bring cigarettes to the U.S. if you are not allowed to smoke? Let alone anywhere?

  8. Jerry Sunday, May 6, 2007 at 6:59 pm #

    Hey guys nice website! I don't agree with this article, but thats America isn't it? Keep up the good work.

  9. Valeria Peck Friday, June 20, 2008 at 2:03 am #

    fice cloaked croupily puan bescutcheon copiously causson celebrity
    Stroj-Sport s.r.o.

  10. Ярослав Wednesday, May 27, 2009 at 6:21 pm #

    Круто. Подпишусь-ка я на РСС пожалуй. :)

  11. Anonymous Tuesday, April 13, 2010 at 5:15 pm #

    Прикольно и полезно, а будет еще что-нибудь из этой же серии?

Trackbacks and Pingbacks

  1. The Stogie Guys » Blog Archive » Stogie Commentary: Ybor City - Monday, December 18, 2006

    […] Today, many cigar companies and distributors have their headquarters in Ybor, stogies cost about one half of what they do elsewhere in the country, and – perhaps best of all – smoking is tolerated everywhere. Writes Boulware: I live in California, where you have about five minutes to enjoy tobacco before an angry mob beats you to death with pamphlets. […]

  2. The Stogie Guys » Blog Archive » Stogie Guys Friday Sampler VI - Monday, December 18, 2006

    […] 1) Ah, even more Draconian smoking bans out of the vast socialist empire that is the Golden State. While there is no viable scientific evidence proving secondhand smoke is dangerous indoors, the City of San Diego yesterday made lighting up on its parks and beaches illegal. […]

  3. The Stogie Guys » Blog Archive » Stogie Guys Friday Sampler XII - Monday, December 18, 2006

    […] 1) Will another major U.S. city bite the dust? Fascists in Houston certainly hope so. A smoking ban has already been in effect in the Space City for most workplaces since last year – including restaurants – but now a “public safety committee” is pushing to expand the hypocrisy to stand-alone bars. According to the Houston Chronicle, the entire Lone Star State may be patiently waiting to follow Houston’s lead with a statewide ban. […]

  4. The Stogie Guys » Blog Archive » Stogie Commentary: Sorry, I’m No Good with Names - Monday, December 18, 2006

    […] That’s why I’m calling on cigar producers to start printing the exact and complete name of each cigar they manufacture on each band. Don’t get me wrong; I’m not advocating an industry-wide regulatory board. And you know I’d never ask for evil government intervention (I’ve had it up to here with their idiotic smoking bans). I’m simply asking private companies to make the decision to print cigar names on their labels so, when I find something I like (as I often do), I know exactly what box to buy. […]

  5. The Stogie Guys » Blog Archive » Stogie Commentary: The Omaha Smoke Police - Monday, December 18, 2006

    […] The government-imposed, Nazi-backed ban also applies to bars that serve food and those that don’t have so-called “keno” licenses (which are – you guessed it – permits you have to pay the city for). So, in other words, if you bribe the government, you can keep their secret police out of your private bar. […]

  6. The Stogie Guys » Blog Archive » Stogie Commentary: The Truth About Anti-Smokers - Monday, December 18, 2006

    […] I heard it again the other day. Listening to a cigar podcast, someone upset at smoking bans referred angrily to the “liberals” who want to impose them. […]

  7. The Stogie Guys » Blog Archive » Stogie News: Club Macanudo Opens in Miami - Tuesday, December 19, 2006

    […] Membership to the Club is limited to 800 members who have access to the club’s private humidor, 24-hour concierge service, conference room and business center, along with other perks. Havana Club members will also enjoy membership to the Downtown Athletic Club as well as reciprocal memberships to more than 150 clubs worldwide, including Club Macanudo locations in New York, Washington DC, London and Jakarta. As a private club, Club Macanudo is not affected by Florida’s draconian anti-smoking laws. […]

  8. The Stogie Guys » Blog Archive » Stogie Commentary: Smokers Don’t Get a Fair Shake - Tuesday, December 19, 2006

    […] We often tell you how smokers are victimized by government-imposed smoking bans that make it illegal for restaurant owners to permit smoking in their establishments. But don’t think for a second that smokers’ treatment as second-class citizens ends there. […]

  9. The Stogie Guys » Blog Archive » Stogie Guys Friday Sampler IX - Tuesday, December 19, 2006

    […] 1) Only eight weeks after Colorado’s statewide smoking ban was thrust upon citizens by the state government, Denver’s ABC 7 reports many small bars have been devastated – losing up to 80 percent of their income. This crushing financial nightmare has triggered massive layoffs and sparked numerous brawls among patrons who are forced to go outside to smoke. Thankfully, a group of local bar owners – calling themselves the Coalition for Equal Rights – filed a lawsuit in federal court challenging the constitutionality of the ban. Good for them. There’s nothing constitutional about forcing your “high horse” agenda on private businesses and individuals. […]

  10. The Stogie Guys » Blog Archive » Stogie Guys Friday Sampler X - Tuesday, December 19, 2006

    […] 1) Add the City of Brotherly Love to the long list of over 470 municipalities with new Draconian smoking bans. Philadelphia Mayor John Street signed the bill yesterday, effectively imposing the tyranny of the majority on all restaurants and most bars. But that’s not the only bad news out of the Keystone State. The Allegheny County Council recently proposed a smoking ban that would force its anti-smoking agenda on all restaurants, pubs, and cigar bars in Pittsburgh – prompting some intelligent opposition from the nation’s capital. […]

  11. The Stogie Guys » Blog Archive » Stogie Guys Friday Sampler XIII - Tuesday, December 19, 2006

    […] 3) Meanwhile, a smoking ban in Suffolk County, Long Island is so restrictive it even bans smoking in cigar bars! This prompts the question: Who exactly is being protected by banning smoking in a cigar bar? The workers who chose to work in a cigar bar? The patrons who chose to go there? Oh, right! Smoking bans aren’t about protecting people…They’re about imposing the will of anti-smokers on others and eliminating individuals’ choices. […]

  12. The Stogie Guys » Blog Archive » Stogie News: Westmont Under Siege - Tuesday, December 19, 2006

    […] Regular readers certainly know how we feel about these oppressive statutes. […]

  13. The Stogie Guys » Blog Archive » Stogie Video: Fascism Healthier than Smoking?! - Tuesday, December 19, 2006

    […] Since people who want to tell us where, when, and if we can smoke seem to be a dime a dozen these days, we spend considerable time covering smoking bans and the health fascists who want to impose them on us. […]

  14. The Stogie Guys » Blog Archive » Stogie Guys Friday Sampler XXV - Friday, January 5, 2007

    […] 1) Well, it’s finally here. No, I’m not talking about the New Year…I’m talking about Washington’s fascist smoking ban. Passed one year ago by the DC Council, all bars and nightclubs were indefinitely coerced into prohibiting smoking starting January 2, 2007. As Washingtonians, the founding Stogie Guys are particularly saddened by this news. Fortunately, though, there are places in this country that still hold freedom of choice dear. So we’ll be doing exactly what the DC business owners feared – taking our business to Virginia. […]

  15. The Stogie Guys » Blog Archive » Stogie News: Washington, District of Insanity - Tuesday, January 9, 2007

    […] As we reported in our latest Friday Sampler, DC’s fascist smoking ban went into effect on January 2. […]

  16. Stogie News: Washington, District of Insanity « Stogie Guys Backup Blog - Tuesday, January 9, 2007

    […] As we reported in our latest Friday Sampler, DC’s fascist smoking ban went into effect on January 2. […]

  17. The Stogie Guys » Blog Archive » Stogie Guys Friday Sampler XXVIII - Friday, January 26, 2007

    […] 4) When your city’s NFL team makes it to the Super Bowl for the first time in over two decades, it usually means a boon for the local sports bars. Unfortunately in Chicago, the Windy City’s fascist smoking ban has meant that business is bad, even though Da Bears have won their way to Super Bowl XLI. The good news? Some surrounding towns have temporarily repealed their smoking bans. Unfortunately, on March 15 a Cook County-wide ban will make any temporary repeals irrelevant. […]

  18. The Stogie Guys » Blog Archive » Stogie News: Analysis of Virginia Smoking Ban Legislation - Wednesday, January 31, 2007

    […] Overall, the proposed Virginia smoking ban is just like every other smoking ban: a paternalistic infringement on individual liberty and property rights. […]

  19. The Stogie Guys » Blog Archive » Stogie Guys Friday Sampler XXIX and Super Bowl Cigar Giveaway - Friday, February 2, 2007

    […] 3) With all the bad news about smoking bans (including the one that just went into effect in France) we were pleased that one commenter pointed out this article about a successful challenge in Colorado. Now let’s hope others follow suit and challenge these oppressive smoking bans. […]

  20. The Stogie Guys » Blog Archive » Stogie Guys Friday Sampler XXXV - Friday, March 16, 2007

    […] 1) New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson this week signed into law a statewide smoking ban over the “Land of Enchantment.” The Democrat, a long-shot presidential candidate in 2008, occasionally smokes cigars, but apparently doesn’t think the adult citizens of his state are smart enough to make their own decisions. The prohibition – which goes into effect on June 15 – bans smoking in restaurants, bars, most workplaces, and even near the entrances of buildings. In order to justify this draconian legislation, Richardson cited a bunch of inflated statistics from self-serving groups like the AFL-CIO and the American Cancer Society. […]

  21. Stogie Guys Friday Sampler XLII - Friday, May 4, 2007

    […] 1) Last Tuesday we told you the Illinois State Senate passed a bill to ban smoking statewide in the Land of Lincoln. As the Chicago Tribune reports, on May 2 that bill was approved by the House – effectively prohibiting smoking in all bars and restaurants starting next year. Chalk another one up for the fascists. […]

  22. Stogie News: Smoker Persecution in Britain - Tuesday, June 5, 2007

    […] Those who choose to smoke face a new smoking ban or exorbitant tax nearly every day, under the guise of “public health” – a rarely defined and limitless justification for restricting the choices that individuals are permitted to make about their own lives. […]

  23. Stogie News: Researcher Calls Out Anti-Tobacco Lies - Tuesday, June 19, 2007

    […] »got the American Lung Association to pull a TV advertisement equating smoking around children to physical abuse of children. As you can see, the anti-tobacco nuts keep Siegel busy debunking their bad science. And for his efforts to stop these rabid activists from playing fast and loose with the facts, Siegel has been called “a traitor” and a “tobacco stooge.”Here at Stogie Guys, we disagree with Siegel about the need for any smoking bans – we see smoking as a personal freedom and responsibility issue, where owners of private property, like restaurants and bars, should be free, but never compelled, to ban smoking. […]

  24. Stogie News: A Smelly Cure Worse than the Disease - Wednesday, June 27, 2007

    […] Here at, we make no secret of our distaste for government-imposed, fascist smoking bans. […]

  25. Stogie Commentary: Smoking Ban Lunacy - Tuesday, July 3, 2007

    […] We often rail against smoking bans in abstract concepts like liberty, personal responsibility, property rights and freedom but sometimes an anecdote does an even better job of highlighting the absurdity of such smoking bans. […]

  26. Stogie Guys Friday Sampler XLXI - Friday, July 6, 2007

    […] 1) In September we told you about one devastating effect of the statewide smoking ban Colorado legislators passed last summer: Many bars lost up to 80 percent of their income. But special interest groups in the Rocky Mountain State are still not satisfied. Now anti-tobacco fascists like the American Cancer Society have the law’s exemption for cigar bars in their sights. If regular bars in Colorado lost four fifths of their revenue, what will happen to the establishments whose primary draw is smoking? […]

  27. Stogie Guys Friday Sempler LVI - Friday, August 10, 2007

    […] 1) On Wednesday we reported Houston’s senseless smoking ban was set to take effect on September 1. Fortunately, a coalition of private business owners filed a lawsuit challenging the would-be law, claiming it “will create an unfair competitive environment for them to operate.” The lawsuit may delay enforcement of the ban until the possible trial is complete. […]

  28. Stogie Guys Friday Sampler LXIII - Friday, September 28, 2007

    […] 2) From the same backwards state that brought us the Calabasas calamity comes one of the most obtrusive smoking bans yet. Starting November 8, it will be illegal to light up near children in Belmont, California. The senseless law also forbids smoking in apartments, townhouses, and condominiums that share a common floor or ceiling. What’s next? […]

  29. Stogie Guys Friday Sampler LXVIII - Friday, November 2, 2007

    […] 3) Add a horrifically invasive smoking ban to the list of reasons never to visit Oakland, California. Thanks to a Draconian city council, it is now illegal to smoke in ATM lines, parks, bus stops, and – get this – municipal golf courses. Is this supposed to be a joke? Who are these bans supposed to protect? […]

  30. Video: Presidential Hopefuls Talking Smoking Bans? - Tuesday, November 27, 2007

    […] while I’d like to see more in depth talk about these senseless bans, asking the following question – submitted by a YouTube user from Minnesota – about smoking bans at […]

  31. Stogie Guys Friday Sampler CXII - Friday, August 8, 2008

    […] a comprehensive smoking ban for all public places, joining the cities of Beverly Hills, Burbank, Calabasas, and Santa […]

  32. Stogie Commentary: Smoking Bans Revisited - Tuesday, April 7, 2009

    […] of our first commentaries on this subject was written back in May of 2006. It was prompted by city officials in […]

  33. Stogie Tip: Take Time to Smoke - Wednesday, August 26, 2009

    […] Stogie Commentary: Senseless Fascism […]