Stogie Guys Free Newsletter

Subscribe today for a chance to win great cigar prizes:

Presented by:

Stogie Reviews: Montecristo Edmundo (Cuban)

23 Apr 2009

The Montecristo Petit Edmundo, launched in the summer of 2007, remains one of the most exciting sticks to come out of Cuba in the past few years. I was, and still am, a huge fan of that five stogie-rated masterpiece, on board with the bandwagon that ensued when Cigar Aficionado awarded the pudgy smoke a rating of 94.

Montecristo EdmundoBefore the Petit Edmundo hit the market, though, there was the Edmundo vitola. It, like its shorter and younger offspring, was named for Edmond Dantès, hero of The Count of Montecristo. That adventure novel, as I wrote in my review of the iconic Montecristo No. 2, was the inspiration for the brand’s name because it was a popular choice of rolling floor lectors when Montecristo was established in 1935.

When the Edmundo came out in 2004, it was the first new size to be added to the Montecristo lineup in over 30 years. Composed of tobaccos from the Vuelta Abajo district in the Pinar del Río Province of Cuba, it measures 5.3 inches by 52 ring gauge and sells for approximately $11-14 per stick when bought by the box of 25 or 3-pack.

Unlike the Petit Edmundo, which boasts a fine oily sheen, the Edmundo is drier and wrinklier with a few green spots (also known as “frog eyes”). But it is by no means unattractive. The cigar has a nice reddish hue, a firm feel, a tightly rolled cross section, and a perfect cap.

Smooth spice, nuts, and leather dominate the outset—quite a bit of flavor for a cigar that has very little pre-light aroma. And, reminiscent of the Petit Edmundo, floral hints are also present. As the relatively tight draw opens up after the first inch, the flavors mellow and take on a meaty characteristic. Then, just before that taste overstays its welcome, the profile turns bolder and finishes with a full-flavored pepper spice down the stretch.

All the while the burn line weaves in and out, meandering but not causing any problems. One of the two Edmundos I smoked for this review required a few touch-ups from my torch, and both featured solid gray ashes that held firm until tapped.

I enjoyed this Cuban thoroughly, albeit not as much as the Petit Edmundo. In some ways it was a little greener, a little less complex, and not quite as creamy as its shorter cousin. While that may be due to aging differences, I’ll likely never know; I didn’t buy a whole box of Edmundos so I have no idea when they were rolled and boxed. Still, without that knowledge, I am confident in awarding the Montecristo Edmundo four stogies out of five.

[To read more cigar reviews, please click here.]

Patrick A

photo credit: Stogie Guys

5 Responses to “Stogie Reviews: Montecristo Edmundo (Cuban)”

  1. Moochie Thursday, April 23, 2009 at 6:10 am #

    I also liked this cigar and agree that it isn't quite up to the Petit Edmundo standards.

    Funny that the PEs you smoked for that review back in 2007 were likely younger than the Edmundos you smoked for this review. But, like you said, you'll likely never know 'cause you didn't buy a whole box.

    Thanks for the review as always, guys.

  2. Peter Brown Monday, January 12, 2015 at 1:34 am #

    In matter of structure, this cigar is just perfect. The only thing that this cigar requires from a smoker is to enjoy it very slowly.

Trackbacks and Pingbacks

  1. Quick Smoke: Montecristo Edmundo (Cuban) - Sunday, May 31, 2009

    […] Edmundo has been one of my favorite cigars for some time now, so I was excited to see what the longer Edmundo format had to offer.  While a tad soft to the touch, the Edmundo has the same good looks as the Petit […]

  2. Montecristo Edmuno Cigar Review | Bui4Ever | - Sunday, December 13, 2009

    […] Stogie Guys […]

  3. Montecristo Petit Edmundo vs Montecristo Edmundo | Bui4Ever | - Tuesday, January 5, 2010

    […] as many other online cigar review sites have listed the Edmundo and Petit Edmundo as having 52mm ring gauges. The Edmundos I own are not counterfeits, so it’s a bit perplexing. So as an FYI, the […]