Stogie Commentary: The Truth About Anti-Smokers
21 Nov 2006
I heard it again the other day. Listening to a cigar podcast, someone upset at smoking bans referred angrily to the “liberals†who want to impose them.
It’s a common perception — or, I should say, misperception — that those who favor smoking restrictions are “liberals.” Sure, some of them are. But the truth is that the issue, like most, is not so simple.
 Name a group that’s been officially opposed to tobacco for decades. How about the Southern Baptist Convention, which, according to its Web site, adopted a measure in 1984 that calls for, among numerous other actions, taking “leadership in encouraging our people, pastors, and SBC leaders to refrain from using tobacco in any form …â€
Name a group that’s been officially opposed to tobacco for decades. How about the Southern Baptist Convention, which, according to its Web site, adopted a measure in 1984 that calls for, among numerous other actions, taking “leadership in encouraging our people, pastors, and SBC leaders to refrain from using tobacco in any form …â€
Or look at the states with fairly extensive bans. Sure, you’ll find Massachusetts and New York. But you’ll also find Utah and Idaho. And Florida, where voters have chosen Republicans for nearly every statewide office for quite a while – including George W. Bush’s brother as governor twice – approved an extremely restrictive smoking restriction.
Which governor said the overwhelming majority of residents in his state “don’t want to have someone else impose their habit upon them, whether it’s spitting or whether it’s vomiting or whether it’s smokingâ€? And also said he’d support a ban on all cigarette sales in his state? Arkansas Republican Mike Huckabee, according to news reports. He’s also known for this quote: “The country was better off with Leave it to Beaver than Beavis and Butthead. We were better off when the Gideons gave Bibles to the fifth graders than when school nurses gave condoms to the sixth graders. We thought it was better for fathers to take their sons hunting than sons in urban areas hunting for their fathers.â€
Even in California, often associated with liberal nanny-staters eager to take away smoking rights, it isn’t as black and white as that. Among the first communities that moved to ban smoking on beaches and piers were those in Orange County, where, I believe, the last Democratic presidential candidate to win a majority was FDR — before WWII.
Of course, political labels tend to be pretty meaningless, anyway. That’s probably why politicians are so fond of tossing them around. The truth is that there are lots of people who want to stop others from smoking, for whatever reason. Some see themselves as liberals, some as conservatives, some as centrists, some who knows. Perhaps we can just call them what they are: anti-smokers.

 Thanks to Nicholas Jammal, the
Thanks to Nicholas Jammal, the  Some original green shutters survived, so Jammal made a replica of one as a pattern for his workers to copy. They brought the old brick back to its original color, matched missing bricks and created a replacement for the column base at the entranceway.
Some original green shutters survived, so Jammal made a replica of one as a pattern for his workers to copy. They brought the old brick back to its original color, matched missing bricks and created a replacement for the column base at the entranceway. 2) We mentioned it in
2) We mentioned it in  To me, this dark, oily cigar wasn’t anything like that. I found it to be a slow-burning, relatively smooth, full-flavored cigar that developed and dropped several tastes, beginning with a little pepper and ending with some light, sweet touches. Wood and leather tended to dominate, building and diminishing, mixing and mingling.
To me, this dark, oily cigar wasn’t anything like that. I found it to be a slow-burning, relatively smooth, full-flavored cigar that developed and dropped several tastes, beginning with a little pepper and ending with some light, sweet touches. Wood and leather tended to dominate, building and diminishing, mixing and mingling.

 This 6.12 inches by 50 ring gauge cigar had a caramel-colored Ecuador Sumatran wrapper with a few very prominent veins. In fact, one vein protruded dubiously for the length of the cigar more noticeably than any other I’ve seen in my smoking days. It therefore goes without saying that if you’re one of those smokers who obsesses over appearance, you might want to stay away from this one.
This 6.12 inches by 50 ring gauge cigar had a caramel-colored Ecuador Sumatran wrapper with a few very prominent veins. In fact, one vein protruded dubiously for the length of the cigar more noticeably than any other I’ve seen in my smoking days. It therefore goes without saying that if you’re one of those smokers who obsesses over appearance, you might want to stay away from this one.
 Since people who want to tell us
Since people who want to tell us  Patrick Ashby
Co-Founder & Editor in Chief
Patrick Ashby
Co-Founder & Editor in Chief Patrick Semmens
Co-Founder & Publisher
Patrick Semmens
Co-Founder & Publisher George Edmonson
Tampa Bureau Chief
George Edmonson
Tampa Bureau Chief