Stogie Guys Free Newsletter

Subscribe today for a chance to win great cigar prizes:

Presented by:

Stogie News: Debunking the Anti-Tobacco Junk Science

17 Feb 2009

It seems like every week another study comes out on the subject of tobacco. Nearly all are done by advocates of increased “tobacco control” (a euphemism for higher tobacco taxes and expanded smoking bans) and they all seem to come to the same conclusion: more “tobacco control” is needed.

trashNow if the tobacco industry was presenting study after study that concluded that we need fewer smoking bans and lower tobacco taxes, you can bet that reporters and politicians wouldn’t blindly believe their claims. When the anti-tobacco industry has a study that agrees with their anti-tobacco agenda, however, the results are dutifully reported as scientific fact without so much as a second look.

But if the media and politicians aren’t doing their jobs, who can you turn to to get a straight scoop? One of the best sources is Michael Siegel, who runs a blog called The Rest of the Story.

Siegel, himself a doctor and professor of public health, is an unlikely foe of anti-tobacco activists, especially since he is an advocate of workplace smoking bans. According to a bio on Siegel’s organization, The Center for Public Accountability in Tobacco Control, Siegel is “a physician with 21 years of experience in tobacco control who recently became disillusioned by the direction in which the anti-smoking movement is going.”

According to Siegel, more and more “[t]he tactics being used by many anti-smoking organizations have become questionable, including misleading and deceiving the public, improperly attacking individuals, and improperly using kids to promote a political agenda.” When anti-tobacco activists deemed those who question the link between second hand smoke and lung cancer the equivalent of “holocaust deniers,” Siegel called them out for their fanaticism.

As a doctor and researcher, Siegel has the technical background to examine the methodology of studies to see if the conclusions claimed are actually supported. He finds that they regularly aren’t, such as the often-repeated claim that just a few minutes of exposure to second hand smoke has negative lasting health effects.

Siegel’s writings are invaluable in exposing the “ends justify the means” nature of much of the anti-tobacco movement, whose once possibly well-intentioned aims seem to have turned into an all-out propaganda campaign against an individual’s right to smoke.

Patrick S

photo credit: Actonel

8 Responses to “Stogie News: Debunking the Anti-Tobacco Junk Science”

  1. Calestus Tuesday, February 17, 2009 at 12:26 pm #

    *Cheers* Good post. Thanks for the links!

    Garbage science/studies should be fought no matter what the topic.

  2. Cigar Command Tuesday, February 17, 2009 at 3:21 pm #

    Good on you for getting the word out about these majorly biased reports. I always have to laugh when I see reports coming out that clearly show their agenda in their findings.

  3. Benjy Wednesday, February 18, 2009 at 6:27 am #

    I'm glad that there are people of Michael's credibility and intellect telling it as it is, not necessarily on a particular side of the argument. The best thing aficionados all over the world can do is to continue being as gentlemanly and generous wherever we go. Because like it or not, interaction with BOTLs are the only way most non-smokers will ever come to learning about the joy of stogies.

Trackbacks and Pingbacks

  1. Stogie Commentary: Risk Is Where You Find it - Monday, March 16, 2009

    […] month, Patrick S. wrote a most interesting article on junk science. If you haven’t read it, you should take a few minutes and do so. It’ll certainly get you […]

  2. Stogie Commentary: Smoking Bans Revisited - Tuesday, April 7, 2009

    […] In the open air or inside a bar, “health concerns” seem to be a mere ruse to disguise a movement of politicians, bureaucrats, and busybodies who would simply rather not smell, be near, or tolerate tobacco. Keep in mind that the notion of secondhand smoke as an epidemic is totally overblown. […]

  3. Stogie Commentary: Chipping Away At Our Rights - Wednesday, May 20, 2009

    […] their ultimate goal in public, even though occasionally they let their secret slip. Instead, they twist science to deceptively present themselves as reflective, thoughtful advocates who just happen to […]

  4. Stogie Guys Friday Sampler CXLIV - Friday, June 5, 2009

    […] this commentary from Forbes. It argues that, despite widely accepted claims that depend on  fuzzy science, “many prior studies of smoking bans are riddled with statistical shortcomings.” The author […]

  5. The Survivalist Forum » Blog Archive » A Little Torch of Liberty: Big-government’s War on the Pleasures of Tobacco - Tuesday, October 20, 2009

    […] and unconstitutional war – against tobacco. Punitive taxes, trade restrictions, government-funded phony science, massive regulatory schemes, state-created cartels, violations of property rights, even free speech […]