Stogie Guys Friday Sampler No. 294
22 Jun 2012
As we have since July 2006, each Friday we’ll post a mixed bag of quick cigar news and other items of interest. Below is our latest Friday Sampler.
1) Though many believe California’s Prop. 29, the misguided proposal to dramatically raise tobacco taxes in the Golden State, was defeated at the polls June 5, victory is far from certain. In fact, the margin is now a razor-thin 15,852 votes—less than a half of a percentage point—out of almost 5 million counted at the time of this writing. Election officials aren’t likely to finish completely checking provisional and mail-in votes for a week or two. About 280,000 ballots remain uncounted, with three counties comprising nearly 65% of the uncounted ballots: Los Angeles (131,177), Fresno (24,500), and Sonoma (23,350). On election night, LA was split almost evenly, Fresno was about 60-40 against, and Sonoma the reverse. If the yet-to-be-counted ballots in those three counties break that way again it would likely be enough to ensure Prop. 29’s defeat. But it’s almost certain to be tight right to the end, and a recount is nearly assured.
2) This week, a widely circulated Associated Press article appeared in top newspapers across the country entitled “Cigar lovers to FDA: A cigar isn’t just a cigar.†As its title suggests, the piece outlines the industry efforts to protect premium handmade cigars from disastrous FDA regulations. Bill Spann, CEO of the International Premium Cigar & Pipe Retailers Association, was quoted heavily. “If you’re going to focus your efforts on regulating tobacco products to meet the spirit and intent of the Tobacco Control Act, where is best to spend those scarce resources—on a tenth of a percent of the market or on a huge chunk of the market?†he asked. “You don’t have a middle-schooler or high-schooler standing on the corner with a $15 Davidoff sticking out of their mouth.â€
3) Inside the Industry: In addition to Christian Eiroa’s own brand, CLE Cigars, his Tabacaleras Unidas factory will also be producing Asylum Cigars. Asylum will be launching with three blends, due out in cigar shops soon: Asylum (a medium-bodied Nicaraguan puro), Asylum 13 (a full-bodied smoke), and Schizo (a mixed-filler bundle smoke). Meanwhile, Eiroa’s former brand, Camacho, has launched a new website that the brand is calling “the most dynamic and fully integrated brand website our industry has ever seen.â€
4) Around the Blogs: Cigar Explorer explores an E.P. Carrillo Short Run No. 4. Nice Tight Ash checks out the Partagas 1845 Corona Extra. Stogie Review reviews a Romeo by Romeo y Julieta. Cigar Inspector inspects an H. Upmann Magnum 48 2009 EL.
5) Deal of the Week: Certain cigars are rarely if ever discounted. But by using some of the coupons on this page you can get 15% off any purchase over $150, including on brands like Illusione, Tatuaje, Viaje, and La Flor Dominicana. (Hurry, the discount expires in 2 days.)
photo credit: Defeat Prop. 29
Good news in the California Secretary of State’s closing report Thursday. The margin has expanded to 27,326 with only 146,831 ballots left to be examined. With the spread now at .6%, the likelihood of success is improving. And the final results may be reported sooner than expected.
I just hope that there is nothing fishy with the vote counting. Unfortunately these days it wouldn't surprise me to have people falsifying votes. I mean, this would generate a good amount of money for the state.
I totally oppose this type of tax, but you know there are high ranking state officials that would love to have even more disposable money and since most politicians are corrupt in some way anyways, why would it be different here.
Even better news! Just a few minutes ago the AP said its analysis of the remaining ballots has led it to declare that Prop. 29 has been defeated.
Here's what we're up against:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/22/us-usa-…
Reuters credits two reporters and an editor on that story, and apparently they couldn't find anyone from the "No on 29" side to quote, or even someone from the Yes side who was interested in anything other than the most inflammatory rhetoric like "Big Tobacco lied in order to put their profits ahead of Californians' health."
No one who doesn't live in California or has been following the issue closely would be able to figure out from this article why the proposition was defeated or would know that major newspapers (I'm sure the LA Times and I believe the Sacramento Bee among others) endorsed the No side.
That article is the worst, most one-sided piece of "journalism" I've seen in a long time, and that's saying something.